| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Least Favorite Strategy Game
Started by dundun2007, Sep 24 2004 02:17 PM
16 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 01 April 2006 - 09:54 AM
i absolutely loved the Age of empires, liked Age of Empires2 and the Rise of Rome. Age of Mythology was also good. So i was waiting for Age Of Empires 3. When i finally got my hands on it,It stinked big time. The only thing good was its pre-game video. The game obviously lets down the name of its predecessors. The game runs so slow, the characters look like trees and when a fight is taking place on water, the system will hang unless you move to a non-battle location. so AOE 3 gets my vote for the least favorite strategy game i have played
#3
Posted 05 April 2006 - 02:18 PM
Ok, I'll be first to admit Age3 wasn't that great, but I do believe it's still a solid game, albiet missing a bit on the "new/innovation" department, as well as a slightly unengaging single player campaign.
Worst strategy game for me? Um, I didn't really like Star Trek: Birth of the Federation all that much, confusing at times... oh and Theme Park (including the sequels) never rocked my boat... Roller Coaster Tycoon all the way
Worst strategy game for me? Um, I didn't really like Star Trek: Birth of the Federation all that much, confusing at times... oh and Theme Park (including the sequels) never rocked my boat... Roller Coaster Tycoon all the way
#5
Posted 31 May 2006 - 01:55 AM
I would most likely have to say the Yu-gi-oh! Card game. A fad that sure died quick, eh? The strategy only involved flipping traps. That's all. No planning, no 'one-step-ahead' thinking, nothing. You just set a trap on your turn and waited to see if your opponent would fall for it on his turn. Bleh.
#6
Posted 16 June 2006 - 04:50 AM
Okay, strategy RPG for me was Stella Deus... it's HORRIBLE
This is basically how it works
enemy = lv36
you = lv35
You = get OWNED
enemy = lv36
You = lv36
Fair Fight
enemy = lv36
You = lv37
You OWN the enemy
Very basic idea, and the story's sooo bad
As for the PC RPGs.. well I've played Age of Mythology, Empire Earth Series, Heroes of Might and Magic, Civilization 3... loved them all.. no complaints really, all are unique in their own way
This is basically how it works
enemy = lv36
you = lv35
You = get OWNED
enemy = lv36
You = lv36
Fair Fight
enemy = lv36
You = lv37
You OWN the enemy
Very basic idea, and the story's sooo bad
As for the PC RPGs.. well I've played Age of Mythology, Empire Earth Series, Heroes of Might and Magic, Civilization 3... loved them all.. no complaints really, all are unique in their own way
#7
Posted 15 August 2006 - 08:41 PM
The worst RTS I've ever played has got to be Lords of Everquest. I got it expecting that Everquest would make a good port to the rts format which really, I'm sure it could have but Lords Of Everquest definitely wasn't it. The graphics weren't too bad, but the gameplay lacked big time. The game played like it was unfinished and many aspects of it seem to have been hurried through production. The amount of patches that gave any new content especially where it needed it, never came. I'd rather play a good game of a classic rts like warcraft or command and conquer any day to Lords of Everquest.
#9
Posted 24 June 2007 - 09:21 AM
age of empire is so boring ,,,,,,,, single game can take 24 hours and lack of good grafics
like stronghold crusade wich have good graphics
i think that stronghold should come up with it new versions and expansion packs..
a very good game
COD SP is also so good
like stronghold crusade wich have good graphics
i think that stronghold should come up with it new versions and expansion packs..
a very good game
COD SP is also so good
#10
Posted 24 June 2007 - 02:55 PM
Nitefell, on May 31 2006, 09:55 AM, said:
I would most likely have to say the Yu-gi-oh! Card game. A fad that sure died quick, eh? The strategy only involved flipping traps. That's all. No planning, no 'one-step-ahead' thinking, nothing. You just set a trap on your turn and waited to see if your opponent would fall for it on his turn. Bleh. 
for me the worst strategy game (i only play on playstation and game boy advance) is riviera. the game's pretty straightforward, you have a main character, which is a guy (supposed to be a fallen angel) and 4 supporting female characters (2 ordinary humans, 1 sort of like a vampire, and 1 mage). you gain items which upon usage can acquire skills from, although you have to develop the skills on a limbo-like stage, because it's the only stage where the item does not break. if you fill your bag, you have to throw some items away and if you're unfortunate, you might get rid of the important items. the game is something like "choose your own adventure" in a way that you choose which path to take and see where that leads you. i think the only consolation with the game is for you to choose your own ending with one of the four female characters (actually there's 6, you get 2 more endings, one the worst ending of them, and the other with your familiar).
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















