8 replies to this topic

[Raptrex]

Read it here

lol i acutally got the sample file

well i didnt know playboy was on the ipod photo
but now its on the psp

you can subscribe for nude and non nude photos
and i guess get movies

would any of you do this???

[R0boT39]

Well i dont even have one, i wish i did, its pretty sweet, there are other games that show nudity, an example is Leisure Suit Larry. Im thinking that you are only allowed to buy the playboy pictures for the psp if you are over 18 right? at least that would be good.

[Raptrex]

of course if your over 18
but how would they know???????

[eXtreme]

lol playboy's in everywhere.. PC games, Ipod, now the PSP?

ooww. But you can be sure they're lots of people who're loving the ideia..

[Señor Maniac]

How many people today think that what the companies like playboy are doing to get business is very sick. I mean if they have to resort to some form of entertainment that little kids are going to play then I think that it is wrong. I think that they should find better ways of advertising rather than using a gaming system.

[Johnny]

Señor Maniac, on Apr 28 2005, 04:41 PM, said:

How many people today think that what the companies like playboy are doing to get business is very sick.  I mean if they have to resort to some form of entertainment that little kids are going to play then I think that it is wrong.  I think that they should find better ways of advertising rather than using a gaming system.

Good point. Using a medium that is mainly directed towards younger audiences is quite appalling, really. I mean, sure, what guy hasn't checked out porn (I have), but it's not meant for younger children, and that's where the line is drawn.

[rejected]

Well, if I were a growing boy going through puberty right now I might just get this..

[s243a]

Señor Maniac, on Apr 28 2005, 06:41 PM, said:

How many people today think that what the companies like playboy are doing to get business is very sick.  I mean if they have to resort to some form of entertainment that little kids are going to play then I think that it is wrong.  I think that they should find better ways of advertising rather than using a gaming system.

Well, kids watch television to so by that logic it is sic that they are on television. Playboy shows nothing more then nudity. Should we be ashamed of our bodies. Should we think it is sic if we are excited by an attractive body. I would be more concerned by myself if it didn’t have any effect on me. I find it very strange the notion that porn is somehow going to pervert our mind and turn us all into sexual deviants. Studies have shown the beneficial aspects of porn.

Were do we equate the fact that if someone sees the image of something sexual that it is going to make the viewer go out and have lots of sex. I bet if you did a study you would find that people that watch porn are less sexually promiscuous. Why? Because if people wanted to do something they would go out and do it instead of watch it. There is a difference between fantasy and reality. The second a fantasy becomes reality it loses its appeal. And just because people watch something doesn’t even mean they are fantasizing about it. It could be curiosity, visual appeal, hummer etc.

If kids don’t get playboy, they will look at the sports illustrated swimsuit addition, the victory secrete catalog or the sears catalog. They will set the timer on there VCR and download sex seans from movies. Kids going though puberty get aroused easy and it is a time in there life when they are discovering themselves. Kids younger then that aren’t going to understand the pictures anyway. They will look at it and say so what. Or grouse. I picture of bodies in a car crash I am sure would have much more of an effect on a kid then naked pictures ever will.

That all said just because porn does not have any serious effect on the viewer we don’t need to plaster it everywhere. I support trap17 effort to control the content of this site so that it appeals to a wider audience. I respect others right to teach there kids the porn is evil. Because not everyone shares the same views as me, I think it is good that trap17 does not allow pornography or profanity. This makes the site appeal to a much wider audience and prevents it from being blocked from services like net nanny. Also I sometimes think that porn is a very cheap form of marketing. I find the way Britney Spears music is marked to twelve year olds much sicker then playboy will every be. At least playboy is honest about what it is and is not trying to be a role model for 12 year olds.

PS, I have a kid that was watching porn who was under 13, I would tell them not to do it. If they did it a lot I would wonder way. I might be concerned I don’t know. Maybe I would take them to consoling or something to see if they are normal. The shrink would probably just tell me it was healthy curiosity I guess….And just to keep track of what they watch or what games they play. So I guess a big part of it is the parents responsibility. Some day, hopefully I will have kids and understand what it is like to be a parent.

[snlildude87]

Well, it's not very surprising that you could store media on the PSP, right? I mean, the PSP was designed so you not only can play games, but you also can store pictures, music, and videos...or at least, that's what I've heard about the new console.