| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Photoshop Cs2
#1
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:29 AM
i like it, there's new features and perks that make work so much easier.
i don't like that the box beside the layers is gone, linking and grouping, making layer sets, etc, is alot more time consuming than it was before. IMO, that should not have been changed. But to make up for that, the ability to customise menus is there, a truly great feature.
what are your thoughts on CS2, its pros & cons?
#5
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:44 PM
I did find the linnk on the adobe site and here it is.
http://www.adobe.com...ewfeatures.html
#6
Posted 29 April 2005 - 12:09 AM
Anyways, CS2 is pretty cool, it has a couple new features, but nothing too "WOWAWESOMEMGOMGOMG"-ish. The smart objects and such aren't really anything too special... They did, however, make the history and layer box into one, which gets annoying, switching back and forth, but I think you can change that...
What I did notice right away, however, is that CS2 still takes just as long to load as CS did, only now it takes even more memory. Every time a dialog box loads it takes about a minute, which is a LONG time for a simple box to load up. It's almost sickening how long it takes to load up the filter gallery. Seriously.
So, my advice to anyone looking to upgrade from 7 or CS, don't. If you already have those, you're fine, and you're not missing out on anything much. All you're going to do is spend more money on a slower, very very slightly modified Photoshop.
***Oh, and also, for some REALLY stupid reason that I don't know, my keyboard shortcuts no longer work. That means everything from copy/paste to creating new layers to deselecting. I'm probably gonna get totally irritated and move back down to CS sometime soon.
And this is all coming from a guy who, 72 hours ago, couldn't wait to get his hands on it.
EDIT -- Hurgh, I accidentally started a new topic about this, because this wasn't in the Photoshop forum, and therefore, I didn't see it. I wouldn't have thought to look in Software...
EDIT2 -- My Adobe "Bridge" also doesn't load at all, it just gives an error and closes. I'm sure it doesn't do this in the "store-bought" version, but still...it sucks.
Edited by Johnny, 29 April 2005 - 12:17 AM.
#8
Posted 29 April 2005 - 02:30 AM
rejected, on Apr 28 2005, 06:54 PM, said:
#9
Posted 30 April 2005 - 01:59 PM
NEways, i'm adding some more comments on it.
I haven't had any problem with Adobe Bridge opening. not like it's a feature i'll be using so much (don't think) because i never used the file browser either.
the full and trial version are the same. when installing it asks if you want to install the full version, or just a 30 day trial. of course you need the serial for the full version.
it can handle the 64-bit processors, and huge ram amounts, better than CS. so if u fall into that category, it's worth. otherwise i would stick with CS too. i mean, i like a lot of the new stuff in CS2, but the price isn't worth it yet. in a while it'll be cheaper. but maybe one reason why it worked slower for you is because it needs a much better computer to run properly than CS1. suppose it'll be the same with Longhorn--it's supposed to need this great system to run properly.
yeah, opening time for me was also about the same as CS. but it does run faster for me, once opened.
the keyboard shortcuts worked fine for me, no problem, and i could edit and change them.
well, nothing so extremely awesome, but it does help me shave off precious minutes here and there when working.
BTW--has anyone gotten the full Creative Suite CS2 yet?
#10
Posted 30 April 2005 - 07:52 PM
Styx, on Apr 30 2005, 06:59 AM, said:
NEways, i'm adding some more comments on it.
I haven't had any problem with Adobe Bridge opening. not like it's a feature i'll be using so much (don't think) because i never used the file browser either.
the full and trial version are the same. when installing it asks if you want to install the full version, or just a 30 day trial. of course you need the serial for the full version.
it can handle the 64-bit processors, and huge ram amounts, better than CS. so if u fall into that category, it's worth. otherwise i would stick with CS too. i mean, i like a lot of the new stuff in CS2, but the price isn't worth it yet. in a while it'll be cheaper. but maybe one reason why it worked slower for you is because it needs a much better computer to run properly than CS1. suppose it'll be the same with Longhorn--it's supposed to need this great system to run properly.
yeah, opening time for me was also about the same as CS. but it does run faster for me, once opened.
the keyboard shortcuts worked fine for me, no problem, and i could edit and change them.
well, nothing so extremely awesome, but it does help me shave off precious minutes here and there when working.
BTW--has anyone gotten the full Creative Suite CS2 yet?
YES! Prince of Persia's done! *runs off*
#14
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:14 PM
#16
Posted 01 May 2005 - 01:21 AM
Odyssey, on Apr 30 2005, 01:05 PM, said:
That would make for a GIGANTIC program, that would suck resources and kill your memory. X.x Two seperate programs for two entirely different things.
Danieluchis, on Apr 30 2005, 01:32 PM, said:
Why don't you like CS?
JaVe, on Apr 30 2005, 01:59 PM, said:
Hah, Adobe, a side kick. Never heard that one before. I know some people can live without Photoshop, but seriously, it's the king of graphics programs. And it's definitely not a side kick to Corel. Painter is pretty awesome, but have you SEEN Bryce? It's LAME.
Yeah, that was weird about the underground releasing type thing though.
sunster13, on Apr 30 2005, 02:14 PM, said:
It's called Vanishing Point, and it's really not all it's cracked up to be. Wow, you can make a school taller. I don't really see too much use out of it. X.x
Odyssey, on Apr 30 2005, 02:43 PM, said:
Depends on the system. Don't base your entire argument on what someone else's computer can do. I heard it was slow, but I figured I'd check it out. It was still slow on my compy too, but that's probably cause mine is a hunk of junk.
#17
Posted 01 May 2005 - 10:30 AM
what would be nice, instead of adobe and macromedia combining the two into one product, would be to have the option to generate code in ASP and PHP in Imageready.
[quote]QUOTE(Danieluchis @ Apr 30 2005, 01:32 PM)
well... im running on CS and i like it, my best friend told me that he got his new PS and it totally sucked, so well im not losing anything good, besides.. i don't like CS much, and he also told me that it REALLY slowed his computer
*[/quote]
what do you mean? you like CS but you don't?
[/quote]I have it too, it suddenly came out, no big launch and no news on yahoo or anything. Adobe is a bit boring though, i like corel painter for now. But hey, adobe will awlays be essential. Like a side kick. I aquired it but hey, im only a a kid.[QUOTE]
How is Adobe boring? Photoshop is king of the graphics programs. I find it much more versatile than Corel.
#20
Posted 02 May 2005 - 03:24 AM
Johnny, on May 1 2005, 01:21 AM, said:
I agree, it woule make a gigantic program. If maybe Adobe watered down their version of photoshop, and implement it into Dreamweaver, maybe it wont be so huge?
Maybe adobe can release Photoshop CS, and Dreamweaver as seperate programs, but in one package that has a bit of a discount if bought together.
Imagine, how many people use Photoshop and Dreamweaver together? I did for my schools website, and the cost of both programs were phonominal.
#21
Posted 02 May 2005 - 10:35 AM
Odyssey, on May 2 2005, 06:24 AM, said:
Maybe adobe can release Photoshop CS, and Dreamweaver as seperate programs, but in one package that has a bit of a discount if bought together.
Imagine, how many people use Photoshop and Dreamweaver together? I did for my schools website, and the cost of both programs were phonominal.
#24
Posted 03 May 2005 - 01:52 PM
Odyssey, on May 1 2005, 08:24 PM, said:
Maybe adobe can release Photoshop CS, and Dreamweaver as seperate programs, but in one package that has a bit of a discount if bought together.
Imagine, how many people use Photoshop and Dreamweaver together? I did for my schools website, and the cost of both programs were phonominal.
NO. BAD. NO WATERING DOWN PHOTOSHOP. But yeah, that discount sounds nice. Photoshop CS3, Imageready CS3 and Dreamweaver CS3 in one nice little package? Sounds good to me.
Styx, on May 2 2005, 03:35 AM, said:
Lose it's place? Do you know how many people use Photoshop and Dreamweaver side by side for websites? TONS.
alexia, on May 3 2005, 02:12 AM, said:
Yes, Adobe bought out Macromedia. Here's a link to the press release.
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelatio...macromedia.html
#25
Posted 04 May 2005 - 02:36 AM
There is really noting new in this version of Photoshop that I would use. But is terrible at draining resources though.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















