| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Copyright Protection
Started by rejected, Jul 04 2005 07:49 PM
88 replies to this topic
#81
Posted 02 June 2009 - 03:35 PM
All this copyright talk is fine,but the problem is coming up
with the money to sue somebody if they did steal your material.
Not only that,but how would you give a subpeona(Notice
of legal action) to somebody living thousands of miles away?
Then theres all the complications of which court it would be
held in and where.
What a headache.
with the money to sue somebody if they did steal your material.
Not only that,but how would you give a subpeona(Notice
of legal action) to somebody living thousands of miles away?
Then theres all the complications of which court it would be
held in and where.
What a headache.
#83
Posted 02 June 2009 - 11:02 PM
jullaby, on Jun 2 2009, 06:11 AM, said:
Oh no! what about avatars we use? Is my avatar an infringement of copyrights
Its practically impossible to keep from infringing copyrights these days. We don't know the sources of the stuff we see online and not everyone can produce good stuff themselves.
I do agree with anwiii that its good to let your work travel around the internet cuz its really like free marketing.
Its practically impossible to keep from infringing copyrights these days. We don't know the sources of the stuff we see online and not everyone can produce good stuff themselves.
I do agree with anwiii that its good to let your work travel around the internet cuz its really like free marketing.
Copyright Protection is a little secure way of protecting your stuff. Giving your site a Copyright © tag/sign will mean that your sites content is copyright to you and your site. Depending on what you put on it, and from where it was from. Others may have images you take and have them copyright to them.
#84
Posted 26 June 2009 - 04:53 AM
copyright protection means,
example : if an item (CD contents) belongs to an autorised person, then it can be distributed by him/changed only by him.... those contents cannot be changed or sold or distributed by changing the authority of the contents by others.
If i am wrong then, please correct me.
example : if an item (CD contents) belongs to an autorised person, then it can be distributed by him/changed only by him.... those contents cannot be changed or sold or distributed by changing the authority of the contents by others.
If i am wrong then, please correct me.
#85
Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:31 PM
I think that the software companies help to violate the copyrights. Why Nero was created? Why the Ipod was created? Why the Cds are bought like bread?
If the software companies didnīt had created all this programs used to copy the creations(music, movies, photos, software, books) the copyrights never had been violated.
Why Daemon tools did exist? The piracy start in make the copy not in distribute it.
Thatīs my opinion if someone donīt be agree with me, I am sorry.
Regards
If the software companies didnīt had created all this programs used to copy the creations(music, movies, photos, software, books) the copyrights never had been violated.
Why Daemon tools did exist? The piracy start in make the copy not in distribute it.
Thatīs my opinion if someone donīt be agree with me, I am sorry.
Regards
#86
Posted 27 June 2009 - 04:44 PM
Copyright is a copying right. Example: i have made game and if you buy it, you don't have right to copy the game and resell it again on the market. If you get caught for breaking copyright you will be judged on court because that's crime. But nobody respects that copyrights, everybody uses piracy (60% from the peoples are using warez). That's what it is.
#88
Posted 22 November 2010 - 09:17 PM
Copyright can be considered to be the right of somebody to decide what happens with the subject the copyright applies to. So if somebody owns the copyright of a book the copyright holder can decide about the publication of the book.
With a book the use of the copyright can be a sort of clear.
On the internet the existence and the result of a copyright can be unclear. Because it is easy to copy the content of a website it might seem that no copyright applies for the content of a website.
Some content is put on the internet free of rights. The owners of the copyright make the content free to use for any user of the internet.
This means, that for some content of a website it is not immediately obvious and not very clear if the owner of a copyright wants to practice the rights the copyright gives to the holder of the copyright.
It is possible, that not everybody agrees with the idea, that everything that is published on the internet is free of copyright.
With a book the use of the copyright can be a sort of clear.
On the internet the existence and the result of a copyright can be unclear. Because it is easy to copy the content of a website it might seem that no copyright applies for the content of a website.
Some content is put on the internet free of rights. The owners of the copyright make the content free to use for any user of the internet.
This means, that for some content of a website it is not immediately obvious and not very clear if the owner of a copyright wants to practice the rights the copyright gives to the holder of the copyright.
It is possible, that not everybody agrees with the idea, that everything that is published on the internet is free of copyright.
Edited by Eza, 22 November 2010 - 09:21 PM.
#89
Posted 22 November 2010 - 10:09 PM
I don't believe copyright should apply heavily on the internet if it is used in unharmfull ways such as posting episodes of your favorite show on youtube should be okay or downloading your favorite song for free but I would not agree with attempting to sell an item or work as a dj with pirated songs as long as your keep it to yourself copyright isn't a big deal in my book but thats just my two cents on copyright everyone is entitled to there own opinion 
~calebFTW
~calebFTW
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














