| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Drums, Religion, And Demons?
#1
Posted 11 September 2005 - 07:51 PM
Rock and Roll= have sex in the back of a car. That is right. This should be very unattractive to anyone that has any morals I know this seems a little graphic, but it has to be included. I mean, who knew?
Jazz= you want to have sex with someone. What is the matter with people? Who accepted this stuff? And we let kids listen to this stuff? I would highly advise anyone who listens to rock and roll and jazz to reconsider! It isn't okay to listen to it once a week, or once a month, it is wrong. I have stopped. Think about it.
#3
Posted 11 September 2005 - 11:09 PM
What makes me sort of upset is that you say it's wrong. So I can't listen to Led Zeppelin or the Beatles? I can't play a bit of Cake or Weezer while I work? Is this another one of those "I have morals and you don't because you have different tastes from me" debates?
Yes, I thought about it. It doesn't make sense to stop something altogether because of its origins. All of you extremely orthodox religious people can do what you like, but a name is a name and that's all. I'm 15 - I may not have great taste in anything but at least I do have morals that don't extremely exaggerate things like this. What's with you people? It's music, nothing more. So there may not be choirs of angels for me (choirs are annoying already T_T) when I die, but at least I'll get a taste of my beautiful Doors before I kick it.
Besides, isn't Sex, Drugs, and Sex in the back of a car a little redundant?
#4
Posted 12 September 2005 - 02:16 AM
It's complete idiocy to state that rock and jazz are un-christian. I, myself, am a Christian, and jazz happens to be one of my favorite genres of music. As a matter of fact, I'm sitting here listening to Pat Metheny as I type this out.
biscuitrat said:
P.S. Wasn't the word 'Jazz' used as a term for sex after it had been used for years to describe the music. Don't believe everything you hear, pal.
EDIT: Fixed quote tag.
Edited by snlildude87, 12 September 2005 - 02:44 AM.
#5
Posted 12 September 2005 - 02:52 PM
#6
Posted 12 September 2005 - 05:29 PM
I also think it is an oversimplificaton to assume that only listening to Jazz will want to make a woman hop into bed with you. That has never worked with me. Jazz is far to nervous for that in my listening.
If you think, that certain influences should be banned, than I think you are mistrusting God, who gave us free will afterall. People that want to ban music, because of the label that is attached are distorting Gods creative influence. Who are you, who am I, who is that author, to say that Jazz or R&R music cannot lead to a better understanding and appreciation of Gods creation?
I have seen more people loose their faith due to bad preaching and indecent behaviour of the elder and priests than due to Rock&Roll or Jazz - and I have spoken to lots of people.
#7
Posted 12 September 2005 - 08:09 PM
The thing about drums and spirits: OK, I believe that my trombone has a voice of its own. That doesn't mean it's going to come out and possess me and cause me to make all sorts of glissandos. Drummers believe each of their drums has a special voice, and by this, they mean its pitch or its tendency to create certain effects. That would be the "spirit" of the drum. It's not a literal ghost living inside a drum waiting to eat the hapless drummer. It's an allusion, nothing more.
So stop acting so afraid of it. It's a drum, it makes music, it's not satanic. Rock and jazz are perfectly all right to listen to, regardless of their prior implications. Heck, Austrailia started out as a penal colony - does that mean the people who live there today are all prisoners? Not everything you read is actually true or can be interpreted as true - just a warning.
#8
Posted 13 September 2005 - 12:36 AM
OCAC: Are you saying than, it is okay to kill to better understand god's creation, or watch porn, to better understand creation? That argument can be applied to many different things.
Biscuit: Did I say I was afrain? Maybe scared, but not in a way that is fearful! And I am talking about two spirits. Yes, the spirit of the drum, and the other, a spiritual spirit. The person who said this, actually said, it was a evil angel. There is a board, I can't remember it's name, that you put your hand on it, it rises off the floor and you ask questions and text appears to answer it. This is the devil. Now will you say that it is okay to mess round with it? That the board won't possess you simply by touching it? You are being to skeptical. You can't believe everything you hear, like UFOs, but you must at least research, the ones that could mess with your eternal life.
#9
Posted 13 September 2005 - 01:52 AM
Is the board you mentioned a Ouija board? Because other than for cheap thrills and a fright that lasts maybe a minute at a slumber party, there's nothing harmful about it. Just because something levitates doesn't mean it's the devil. I believe the supernatural and the devil have nothing to do with one another. The devil symbolizes the evil and vice and sin within a Christian belief system - as long as my religion maintains its devil-free outlook, I'm not worried about it. Quite frankly, I'm more afraid than UFOs because it seems a closer possibility. I believe there is life on other planets and one of these days, we might meet them or vice versa.
Also, fear is being afraid of being afraid - it's the fear of the suspense filling that moment. If I'm the one being skeptical, why are you the one trying to accuse a trap set of being evil and possessed? It's inanimate for crying out loud. Possession usually only applies to something that is animate and that previously had control over itself.
#11
Posted 13 September 2005 - 02:27 AM
Cerb, on Sep 12 2005, 08:16 PM, said:
That's kind of odd now that you mention it because all these supposed possessions - were they just a way of saying that "you're not on the safe list anymore"? And possessions can happen to the fervent religious as well as non-believers. Heck, you could be a pastor and still be at "risk" for it.
Although I still hold my ground on the animate/inanimate debate.
#12
Posted 13 September 2005 - 06:15 AM
#13
Posted 13 September 2005 - 09:01 PM
#14
Posted 14 September 2005 - 01:23 AM
I don't deny there are supernatural beings out there - I just deny there being such a split between good and evil. I have different gods, and different beliefs. Hinduism doesn't have a clear evil force - there's what's moral and immoral. My religion has a huge history with the supernatural, from asuras to vampires, etc.
And also, Hinduism + possession = ? : We don't really have any scenarios of it. It's just a Christian thing, I assume.
#15
Posted 14 September 2005 - 02:39 AM
#17
Posted 14 September 2005 - 06:52 PM
#18
Posted 15 September 2005 - 04:06 AM
#21
Posted 16 September 2005 - 03:12 AM
At any rate, our spiritual lives are not at risk, mine because I believe there is no true evil in the world, and the others because we all realize drums can't be possessed, and if they could, how scary would that be? "Oh no! I can only play cadences again and again!"
Sorry if I'm biased, but that's what marching band and years of piano does to you @_@
#22
Posted 16 September 2005 - 05:39 AM
#23
Posted 16 September 2005 - 06:54 AM
#24
Posted 16 September 2005 - 05:38 PM
#25
Posted 17 September 2005 - 05:08 AM
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















