| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Skype Vs. Msn
#1
Posted 19 September 2005 - 09:10 AM
msn- it has a louds of options. you cane phone, chat, even have a video conversation. chat is very good. when you phone you hear a slow motion words.
video conversation-> that is good if you want to talk using your hands and legs but if you are trying to speak you will be disapointed. it is soo slow. you can go on bathroom and back and you will see that lips are moving but the voice is late. of course, i am talking about countrie2countrie phoning, soo i dont know is this true.
what do you think?
#2
Posted 19 September 2005 - 10:25 AM
Google Talk is a new alternative! You sign in with your GMAIL Account (Like the way you sign in MSN with your MSN(Hotmail) account). I quality is good and you can connect to the network with ANY Jabber combatible Client(Without Voice). Also, I haven't (Yet) notice any ..long.. delay with GTALK
#3
Posted 19 September 2005 - 02:45 PM
MSN is rather, I would say, quite bad in terms of transmission other than text. Text-messaging would probably be better for MSN. If you try to send a 1MB file to the same person using MSN, and then using another data transmission program, etc IRC DCC, MSN would most probably end up last or connection terminated without even tranmiting the entire 1MB file. Voice wise, it's still alright but not for quality-hungry people. I would rather say MSN voice is often laggy and the connection is bad.
TO summarise, Skype wins in terms of communication, be it data transfers or voice calls.
#4
Posted 19 September 2005 - 04:54 PM
MSN's voice chat is the worst I can say, even Google Talk which is in beta does a better job at connecting and voice quality. MSN is just there for text messaging. I have truthfully never used any other features except that and webcam, hopefully the webcam feature of Skype will be complete soon so that I won't have to use MSN for that either.
#5
Posted 19 September 2005 - 06:00 PM
Check it out here... http://www.video4skype.com/
So we can now discard MSN for the voice, webcam and data transmission. Use it solely for text messaging.
#7
Posted 27 September 2005 - 04:30 PM
And as of chat, i dont have many friends plugged around skype and the ones i have in skype have messenger, so we usually chat trough ms software.
By the way, MSN means Microsoft Network, its usually mistaken with MSN Messenger, hehe sorry about my pedantism.
#8
Posted 27 September 2005 - 07:08 PM
For online chat I preferred msn while for internet phone like PC to PC call which is free I really like Skype. Its so clear. I've been making calls from Asia to Canada, Japan and United States using skype PC to PC calls.
#10
Posted 12 November 2005 - 03:57 PM
#14
Posted 20 November 2005 - 05:42 PM
I prefure Voicebuster atm since some landline calles are free
#16
Posted 27 November 2005 - 08:52 PM
Even though Skype can send files and folders faster than MSN, that is only one priority.
MSN is unarguably the biggest online messaging service EVER.
Also MSN unlike Skype, has add-ons, like MSN Plus, which makes the program even more exciting that it already is.
One of the things that impress me about MSN is the speed and the quality. You must remember how much people actually use MSN to contact theyre family and friends. Despite all that, MSN still runs smoothly at all times.
Skype hasn't had any new features for a VERY long time. This is maybe why not many people use Skype.
Even though Skype at the moment has better contacting tools, MSN will keep progressing until it takes over.
The minority of people who use MSN is overwhelming.
Long live, possibly one of the greatest program inventions of all time!
#17
Posted 30 November 2005 - 07:13 PM
But if you're only planning to type text, MSN would be a better choice.
#18
Posted 07 February 2006 - 02:59 AM
Tonny, on Sep 19 2005, 04:10 AM, said:
msn- it has a louds of options. you cane phone, chat, even have a video conversation. chat is very good. when you phone you hear a slow motion words.
video conversation-> that is good if you want to talk using your hands and legs but if you are trying to speak you will be disapointed. it is soo slow. you can go on bathroom and back and you will see that lips are moving but the voice is late. of course, i am talking about countrie2countrie phoning, soo i dont know is this true.
what do you think?
I LOVE MSN. MSN is country to country too, but like...with skype it's so horrible. Every thing is low class and slow. It's just like you said, not for everyday things. MSN video convo is kind of slow though. I have a webcam and it's always freezing on me. =/ Same with the voice.
#19
Posted 07 February 2006 - 06:46 AM
#21
Posted 08 February 2006 - 10:59 AM
The problem with Skype is I don't know as many people that use it, and I've been using MSN for at least 5 years now, so I've got some really old contacts on it
#23
Posted 11 March 2008 - 03:15 AM
Skype Vs. Msn
I use MSN all the time for video and voice chat and it works fine. Tried Skype as well and its probably just a little bit better.
But not worth the hassle to download, configure and get all my mates to switch from MSN which comes pre-installed with their laptop.
As with all other pre-installed Windows applications like browser, msn, media player, etc, alternative apps has to be TONS better for me to replace them and not just a LITTLE better like Skype or Firefox.
-reply by bennido
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














