Jump to content



Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest , Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply w/o Sign-Up!
- - - - -

What Processor Do You Prefer?


30 replies to this topic

Poll: what is the best processor for you?

what is the best processor for you?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 bonniecool

    Newbie [Level 2]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPip
  • 36 posts

Posted 07 October 2005 - 03:18 AM

What processor do you like to use?

These processor has their own functions in every uses which processor do you prefer to use. Even in work or just in gamin?

Notice from BuffaloHELP:
Edited title's grammar.

Edited by BuffaloHELP, 25 October 2005 - 12:18 AM.


#2 Rubyducky

    Newbie [Level 2]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 07 October 2005 - 06:32 AM

If I am gaming, I like AMD. If I'm going to do everyday work, then I'd choose Intel. Intelis more compatable with more programs, but AMD works games better.

#3 E-Sector

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 146 posts

Posted 07 October 2005 - 10:38 AM

IBM Power PC IS the Best processors. Then I think AMD is on the second place, intel is so slow.

http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/2002/07...cw_macvspc2.htm

http://www.apple.com...ac/performance/ :huh:

#4 gotenx

    Member [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 68 posts
  • Location:California
  • Interests:Computers, teh l4die5, Anime

Posted 09 October 2005 - 02:28 AM

AMD beats intel and powerpc all the way. Much more stable and fast. Theres nothing else I can say but try it yourself.

#5 grnjd

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts

Posted 09 October 2005 - 02:38 AM

Amd is better because my notebook has it :huh: So im bias, but it is truly better since its more stable, has more power, but its sad that its not that compatible. Intel is like the internet explorer of processers, while amd is like mozilla

#6 hulunes

    .::UniCorN::.

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 973 posts
  • Location:Dalian CHN
  • Interests:basketball &drawing,digital pro.

Posted 09 October 2005 - 02:43 AM

interesting,after my voting the result is deuce(both are 42.6%).although its huge amounts of transistors make huge quantity of heat...from the market foreground,intel will be the winner furthermore last to the real 64bit time(having to admit that AMD is powerful in CISC family indeed). :huh:

#7 mayank

    Mankie

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • Location:New Delhi, India
  • Interests:working on my website, making friends, cricket.
  • myCENT:70.62

Posted 24 October 2005 - 06:13 AM

I have AMD Athlon 64 bit 3000+ and it is working for me and giving me the performance i want and that too at a lower rate. The only downside of this processor is that it is having less l2 cache and that is of only 512 kb...i would have been better if it was either 1 mb or 2 mb. I dont know how it is possible that processor of speed of 2.0 Ghz is able to compete with Intel's 3.0 Ghz and that is the reason why they call it 3000+..strange huh?

#8 electriic ink

    "Britons never never shall be slaves." As true now as it was in 1740.

  • [MODERATOR]
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,262 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Heaven
  • Interests:Promotion: Aug 4 2005 8.24pm BST
  • myCENT:74.43

Posted 24 October 2005 - 06:51 AM

Notice from cmatcmextra:
Malish and tdktank59 both your posts in this topic have been deleted because the majority of the content of the post was clear plagerism. This is your last warning, next time none of you will have this message to warn you.


#9 DreamCore

    Premium Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 199 posts

Posted 24 October 2005 - 09:43 AM

I am using Amd and I agree, I think its more stable with games than Intel. Intel I think its more for work and programms, not games. So I would preffer AMD if you like gaming. And Intel if you are spending most of you time with C and C++ or making websites or other things.

#10 T100

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 282 posts

Posted 24 October 2005 - 10:57 AM

I will stick to Intel. Although Athlon outperforms Intel's counterparts in many of the PC mark tests and even Super Pi test, Athlon is not as good in Front Side Bus and memory management. Intel P4 can take up dual channel bandwidth but Athlon is a little bit slow in Ram test. Another bad thing about Athlon is the L2 cache. While intel can provide 2MB cache, most of AMD CPUs only provide 512K, which is only that povided by Athlon. I think CPU's performance depends much on L2 cache and frequency, so I still sticking with Intel.

The worst thing about AMD is that it is trying to market its CPUs by a performance value, say 3000+, but the clock speed is much lower then 3G. I really don't like this strategy. If AMD is so proud of its CPUs, why not compute with Intel on the same ground?




Reply to this topic


This post will need approval from a moderator before this post is shown.

  


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users