Edited by Saint_Michael, 03 November 2005 - 04:12 PM.
| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Kfc Does Not Use Real Chickens
#2
Posted 03 November 2005 - 04:06 PM
Do you have any links to confirm this?
I know that major fast food companies use "battery" chickens, and I think that scientists have engineered a featherless chicken a few years ago, but I don't think that they keep them alive in any sorts of tubes...
This is disgusting enough: http://www.downthela...et/battery.html
#5
Posted 03 November 2005 - 08:00 PM
I dont really know what to believe, they may not use real chicken but does that make it wrong? And to be honest, when you ever buy a KFC do you taste the difference from another fast food place? Maybe they dont use real chickens
Something to thing about.
#7
Posted 03 November 2005 - 10:47 PM
Yeh my mum also says a lot of weird things.. like KFC causes you to start puberty at an earlier age.. and thickens the tashe's on the girls.. mostache... i mean. .whhat?
oh yeh. Some girl got ill from eating too much kfc.. not ill.. but something to do with her body and it broke down and couldn't handle all the crap.
#8
Posted 03 November 2005 - 11:04 PM
#11
Posted 04 November 2005 - 12:20 AM
http://www.themeatrix.com/
its quite interesting if you ask me. My teacher showed us that in our class one day and its just disgusting how they do the things to the animals. Its in humane yet they taste so good at their expense. I'm starting to sound evil. I can't believe it. But I don't eat KFC chicken. I eat Churches chicken only. Maybe its cheaper or something. But I like Churches. lol. okay. just look at the site. It won't dissappoint you.
#13
Posted 04 November 2005 - 04:40 PM
#14
Posted 04 November 2005 - 09:49 PM
Here is the link for this myth at snope:
http://www.snopes.co...rs/food/kfc.asp
Having a chicken genetically engineered to have no beak or feathers and dependant upon tubes would probably cost a lot more than just using normal chickens because they most likely would be unable to reproduce meaning that every egg would have to be genetically modified.
Some of the people here should learn to criticize what they read before believing it. I don't see how people can believe something that sounds so false.
#15
Posted 05 November 2005 - 12:30 AM
#18
Posted 12 November 2005 - 08:34 PM
bureX, on Nov 3 2005, 12:06 PM, said:
Do you have any links to confirm this?
I know that major fast food companies use "battery" chickens, and I think that scientists have engineered a featherless chicken a few years ago, but I don't think that they keep them alive in any sorts of tubes...
This is disgusting enough: http://www.downthela...et/battery.html
yeah I wonder the same thing if this si a rumor or not, Ive heard about it before. And the link it pretty nasty. Now I dot even want to eat chicken. Never eally did liek it in the first place.
#19
Posted 16 November 2005 - 02:43 AM
As long as it isn't meat from where I use to work I am all for it.
#21
Posted 16 November 2005 - 07:27 PM
There are people who use big names and brand just to create a stir and start of a chain of mails which amazingly grip the whole cyber world. Before passing on these info we should atleast put in some brains behind it and try to find out truth.
#23
Posted 17 November 2005 - 12:31 AM
Ryo, on Nov 3 2005, 03:31 PM, said:
In 2003 a mass email sent to everyone claimed that KFC was banned from using the word "Chicken" due to the fact that their chickens were genetically modified and had vital parts removed such as beaks and wings, thereby no longer making them a chicken. They were apparently kept alive by having nutrients squirted into them through tubes. But there is no record of any ban on KFC, and also it would be treated as cruelty to animals if such a thing was possible. To repeat, the story is a complete hoax.
KFC DOES use real chickens. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
Edited by NDPA, 01 April 2006 - 05:34 PM.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















