Just got Star Wars Battlefront 2 last weekend, Its pretty fun for the most part but i found it to be a bit like the 1st one. Probably one of the biggest changes is the new space battle feature. You can also play heroes in this one too but they arnt as fun to play as you would think they would be. As far as the single player campaign goes, its relatively short and if you are somewhat of a skilled player, you can pretty much run through it, unless that is if you are playing on Elite Mode (increased difficulty). I found the AI to be a bit glitchy especially in terms of the ground battles in which the AI constantly gets stuck in walls, corners etc. If your a hardcore star wars fan by all means buy the game otherwise, you may want to skip this game.
| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest 
, Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply
w/o Sign-Up!
| |
0
11 replies to this topic
#3
-
- Kontributors
-
- 178 posts
Premium Member
Posted 12 November 2005 - 10:30 PM
I personally dont like games like this that are basically for the most part at least entirely focused on multiplayer. I am unfortunatly one of the few people left on this earth that still DOSNT have fast internet and due to where I live i cant get it. So it just sorta bugs me that a game with good graphics, Good gameplay and and just an all around sweet game cant be played by me because the single player is almost zero. So I really wish companies would stop making SOOO many games based on nothing but multiplayer.
#4
-
- Kontributors
-
- 90 posts
Member [Level 3]
- Location:Canadian Wilderness
- Interests:Many things unknown to you :P<br />
Posted 12 November 2005 - 11:28 PM
Quote
Why is this in the RTS section... it should be in action... BF2 isn't an RTS game...
Battlefront 2 not Battlefield 2
I loved the first one. But i havent bought the second one yet.
#5
-
- Kontributors
-
- 178 posts
Premium Member
Posted 13 November 2005 - 07:42 PM
Elegost, on Nov 12 2005, 03:28 PM, said:
Battlefront 2 not Battlefield 2
I loved the first one. But i havent bought the second one yet.
I loved the first one. But i havent bought the second one yet.
True However its still not an RTS it would deffinetly fall better under the category of action. But then again all action games are RTS's because RTS means real time strategy and it is in real time but how much strategy? I guess the only games that would for sure not be RTS are turn based games such as civilazations?
#6
-
- Kontributors
-
- 264 posts
Super Member
Posted 24 November 2005 - 05:03 PM
I agree,
This should be under an action section. This is a great game though. So much better than the first one. I got the game about a week ago and i find it to be much better than the 1st on in both graphics and gameplay. I masterd the first one very well. I think I had 135 kills as my highest. I usually average around 60-70 kills a game. How do you guys usually do?
This should be under an action section. This is a great game though. So much better than the first one. I got the game about a week ago and i find it to be much better than the 1st on in both graphics and gameplay. I masterd the first one very well. I think I had 135 kills as my highest. I usually average around 60-70 kills a game. How do you guys usually do?
#7
-
- Kontributors
-
- 1 posts
Newbie
Posted 28 February 2006 - 12:32 AM
MystiK1337, on Nov 8 2005, 11:26 PM, said:
Just got Star Wars Battlefront 2 last weekend, Its pretty fun for the most part but i found it to be a bit like the 1st one. Probably one of the biggest changes is the new space battle feature. You can also play heroes in this one too but they arnt as fun to play as you would think they would be. As far as the single player campaign goes, its relatively short and if you are somewhat of a skilled player, you can pretty much run through it, unless that is if you are playing on Elite Mode (increased difficulty). I found the AI to be a bit glitchy especially in terms of the ground battles in which the AI constantly gets stuck in walls, corners etc. If your a hardcore star wars fan by all means buy the game otherwise, you may want to skip this game.
Ryo, on Nov 24 2005, 12:03 PM, said:
I agree,
This should be under an action section. This is a great game though. So much better than the first one. I got the game about a week ago and i find it to be much better than the 1st on in both graphics and gameplay. I masterd the first one very well. I think I had 135 kills as my highest. I usually average around 60-70 kills a game. How do you guys usually do?
This should be under an action section. This is a great game though. So much better than the first one. I got the game about a week ago and i find it to be much better than the 1st on in both graphics and gameplay. I masterd the first one very well. I think I had 135 kills as my highest. I usually average around 60-70 kills a game. How do you guys usually do?
#10
-
- Kontributors
-
- 46 posts
Newbie [Level 3]
- Gender:Male
Posted 06 October 2007 - 02:17 PM
Battlefront 2 is one of my all time favourites, multiplayer is the best though cause the one player storyline is limited, i don't really like the galactic conquest bits cause there are way too many space battles that are although fun, i die a LOT on. I love the gameplay on this and if they made a battlefront 3 on the ps3 or xbox i would not hesitate to get it
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
