Jump to content



Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest , Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply w/o Sign-Up!
* * * * * 1 votes

Amd Verses Intel


81 replies to this topic

#1 KooL

    Member [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 61 posts

Posted 28 July 2004 - 11:14 PM

Which company u like better?
rite now AMD has the edge over intel with there 64 and FX series...

#2 Assassin

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Location:U.S.
  • Interests:N/A

Posted 28 July 2004 - 11:20 PM

But there arent really any 64-bit bit apps right now. I like Intel better, I have a P4 Northwood 3Ghz.

#3 football123213

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 472 posts

Posted 28 July 2004 - 11:27 PM

intel is the best and will be the best

#4 znithy

    Newbie [Level 2]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 02:09 AM

The Winner is AMD.

#5 KooL

    Member [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 61 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 02:37 PM

Yea AMD is better, intel has no plans of making household 64 bit processors in the near future, they are only making 64 bits for buisness use...

AMD has the throne now, but they didnt before their 64 bits B)

#6 xboxrulz

    Colonel Panic

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 607 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 02:52 PM

I love AMD for their price and for its speed.

FACTS:
AMD Athlon XP was rated to be for gaming
Intel Pentium 4 was rated for office use or for developers

#7 KooL

    Member [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 61 posts

Posted 31 July 2004 - 01:21 AM

i disagree, pentium 4's are much better than amd xps, p4s are powerfuller (lol) than xp's in almost all aspects, so how is athlons meant for gaming?

#8 Assassin

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Location:U.S.
  • Interests:N/A

Posted 31 July 2004 - 01:27 AM

The two things that intel are better at is their memory cache and the clock speed.

#9 Shackman

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 423 posts

Posted 31 July 2004 - 02:03 AM

I think there was a thread aobut this issue some time ago.

Anyway, AMD's 64 aren't really doing any good because it does not have any supporting programs or specific OSs they can work with. Of course, the 64 is way more powerful, but as I said, there are not much programs in the world that can tap its full potential.

On the other hand, Intel's new processors are very expensive but it pays because of its stability. Talking aobut stsbility, I use a AMD Athlon xp 1800+ but I do not experience stability issues. The only thing that irritates me is the noise from the CPU fan. My school's computers use Intel processors and I can hardly hear their noise. So from my guess, its probably that AMD cpus produce either more heat, or maybe their coolers jsut can't match Intel.

This conclusion isn't really all fair because I don't have the exact speeds of the school com's CPU and so forth, but this can show some info.(if you can pick up what i mean..)

That's probably why AMD is for gaming and Intel is from devloptment/business.

-Shackman

#10 cti

    Newbie

  • Kontributors
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 31 July 2004 - 02:08 AM

;) intel will always have the #1 spot.




Reply to this topic


This post will need approval from a moderator before this post is shown.

  


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users