| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Notice! About Your Signatures And Avatars
Started by Guest_prodigy_*, Oct 25 2004 03:52 AM
36 replies to this topic
#1 Guest_prodigy_*
Posted 25 October 2004 - 03:52 AM
We have noticed many more users unfortunately exceeding their bandwidth and thus not being able to allow any acces for themselves or others to their own sites. We have also noticed that their has been a large increase in the number of page views at trap17 from search engines ..etc (which is good for this community).
However we now have come to the conclusion that users linking their avatars but most likely image signatures are losing a great deal of bandwidth with the amount of page views totalling over 50,000 views per day. Whenever one of these many guests loads a page containig your signature or avatar linked to an image on you account, you suffer. And bulk views increase the amount of your bandwidth used considerably.
So we advise you to change your signatures to text links or host your signature images on image hosting servers, this will be for you benefit.
All members post sites for free image hosting here, so other can upload their files to these.
thankyou
However we now have come to the conclusion that users linking their avatars but most likely image signatures are losing a great deal of bandwidth with the amount of page views totalling over 50,000 views per day. Whenever one of these many guests loads a page containig your signature or avatar linked to an image on you account, you suffer. And bulk views increase the amount of your bandwidth used considerably.
So we advise you to change your signatures to text links or host your signature images on image hosting servers, this will be for you benefit.
All members post sites for free image hosting here, so other can upload their files to these.
thankyou
#4
Posted 25 October 2004 - 10:55 AM
#7
Posted 25 October 2004 - 11:57 AM
About upgrading things: If you're concerned about that as a problem, simply wait until the end of the month. (Now, or the 30th-31st.)
Photobucket, I beleive has a limit (at least I think I read that.) of something. (Can't remember it.. I'll take a look after I get home from school today.)
Photobucket, I beleive has a limit (at least I think I read that.) of something. (Can't remember it.. I'll take a look after I get home from school today.)
#9
Posted 27 October 2004 - 11:05 AM
Bash, on Oct 25 2004, 10:55 AM, said:
Yeah, thats what i host all of mine on
#11 Guest_prodigy_*
Posted 05 November 2004 - 12:44 PM
great 
now we have a increasing number of image hosts which people can use to save their bandwidth. As follow;
*imageshack.us
*http://www.photobucket.com/
*http://photobucket.com/
NOTE: If you have an account with graphics design,, etc and design for customers or friends, I reccomend you don't host their files for show and tell using your account. As they may hotlink your image and further increase your bandwidth use. I have talked to a few people who have done this and exceeded their bandwidth limit. So it is probably smart to use the above image hosts or another host for instances such as this.
now we have a increasing number of image hosts which people can use to save their bandwidth. As follow;
*imageshack.us
*http://www.photobucket.com/
*http://photobucket.com/
NOTE: If you have an account with graphics design,, etc and design for customers or friends, I reccomend you don't host their files for show and tell using your account. As they may hotlink your image and further increase your bandwidth use. I have talked to a few people who have done this and exceeded their bandwidth limit. So it is probably smart to use the above image hosts or another host for instances such as this.
#13
Posted 13 November 2004 - 02:08 PM
I am using ImageShack and it hasnt been using up my BW.
Thats kool. Go for ImageShask and you wont have to loose your BW to ppl signing in from SEs.
Thats kool. Go for ImageShask and you wont have to loose your BW to ppl signing in from SEs.
#14
Posted 13 November 2004 - 02:15 PM
odomike, on Nov 13 2004, 02:08 PM, said:
I am using ImageShack and it hasnt been using up my BW.
Thats kool. Go for ImageShask and you wont have to loose your BW to ppl signing in from SEs.
Thats kool. Go for ImageShask and you wont have to loose your BW to ppl signing in from SEs.
#18
Posted 26 November 2004 - 08:10 PM
Also, please do not use image links directly off an external website. Do not hotlink images from other website because in that case, the web site owner of that site is going to suffer. I had an issue a month back, a guy from an external site was blaming trap17 for his BW drain. That site was not hosted with Trap17 but some user had hotlinked the image. Also, it is better that members who have cool graphics on their site, use the image hotlinking option in the cpanel to protect their own graphic files.
#19
Posted 07 March 2005 - 01:15 PM
www.picsplace.to
easy to use, they display a browse form right away, you select your pic and it gets uploaded instantly with multiple results:
easy to use, they display a browse form right away, you select your pic and it gets uploaded instantly with multiple results:
forum link (clickable thumbnail): [url=http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/sneeuw1.JPG][img]http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/thumbs/sneeuw1.JPG[/img][/url] forum link: [img]http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/sneeuw1.JPG[/img]
html code (clickable thumbnail): <a href="http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/sneeuw1.JPG"><img src="http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/thumbs/sneeuw1.JPG" alt="Image hosted by PicsPlace.to" ></a> html code: <img src="http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/sneeuw1.JPG" alt="Image hosted by PicsPlace.to" >
direct link: http://www.picsplace.to/5/1112/sneeuw1.JPG
#24
Posted 31 October 2005 - 05:57 AM
prodigy,you are the group of "unregistered"?
i have noticed the problem long ago,i erased the avatar and image on my signature.
now I am tring to build the new forum on my site just with text but no images,(the same as the trap17's,like "New Topic" " Reply ",so so).This not only speeding the load time,but also discrease the bandwidth of my account.It was built by punbb,which the designing based on the xhtml 1.0 stict and css layouts.
i have noticed the problem long ago,i erased the avatar and image on my signature.
now I am tring to build the new forum on my site just with text but no images,(the same as the trap17's,like "New Topic" " Reply ",so so).This not only speeding the load time,but also discrease the bandwidth of my account.It was built by punbb,which the designing based on the xhtml 1.0 stict and css layouts.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














