36 replies to this topic

[Plenoptic]

I never thought that could happen before. Then again I never really had problems with Bandwidth either because my site never really got big. Luckily I don't use images in my signature at the moment anyway because otherwise I'd have some trouble. Maybe I'll have to start hosting my images on Photobucket or something becuase I put my images up on other forums I go to because I make them for people at my clan's forum and they all use it. In fact one of them is a banner. I might have to change the location if it becomes a problem.

Edited by Plenoptic, 19 August 2006 - 02:43 PM.

[callumms]

Photoshop is the best for me. Most people just want people to visit their sites

[joeblogg]

okay thanks for telling us that.

[ipin]

The Best Image Uploder is
http://www.imageshack.us/

[Jezstarr]

Bash, on Oct 25 2004, 08:55 PM, said:

here's a nice, quick, and easy image hosting site:

http://www.imageshack.us/

Yes that's a good one, nice and quick i agree. Photobucket is if you want to keep a album of heaps of images but not really if you are only uploading one or a few. Well that's what I do!

[Xalor]

PhotoBucket is the best in my opinion. Piccodle or ImageShack aren't that great since they delete your images, after a bit and they have limited bandwith. PhotoBucket on the other hand gives you unlimited bandwith and you can upload them and organize them well. Since I am not avid fan of DeviantArt thats why I have my own PhotoBucket to use as my personal location for signatures instead of large art. I find that you won't finish its bandwith I believe even thought they claim its unlimited, there is some level of a limit. Avatars are done by ourselves, anyway so its not a problem since Trap hosts our avatars, they aren't that big anyway.

[chaos3932]

Photobucket has very small bandwidth, and imageshack often complains about using the direct image link for posting on forums.

this site would be better for using with forums
http://www.imagehosting.com/