| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
An Elevator Leading All The Way To Space!
#1
Posted 23 January 2006 - 11:50 PM
personally i think this would be total awsome!! but here is how it would be donw,
ok, welll as some of us know once you reach a certin point in space gravity gives awayand instead of pulling down towards the planet, it pulls away from the planet.. and so the ideal is to get a HUGE weight, probably like a humongus space station or somthing big n heavy and putting it right outside of the earths geosynchronous orbit (which is: basicly the last part of the atmosphere... but defined by wikepedia! it is A geosynchronous orbit is a geocentric orbit that has the same orbital period as the sidereal rotation period of the Earth. It has a semi-major axis of 42,164 km [1] Thanx!)
so now, wit that counterweight they would have all of the mechanics i would imagine up there with a cable built up of material with a super high tensile strength..i think my teahcer said it was somthing like microorganisms or somthing like that.. but the cable would span from earths surface to the counterweight in space with an elevator that basicly went up and down hat cable..
people would prefer this over using rockets..i think it would be safer..
i had a question but it was answered--the weight in space would move around with the earth, so i wouldn't stay in one place...
i think it would be much better to do this..less polution! and they can have things take off from a platform in space >_< that would be soo cooll
i also thing it would be cool if you could pay to go up there and stay for a while!
i hope somthing like this does happen before i die! hehe
#2
Posted 24 January 2006 - 12:33 AM
#3
Posted 24 January 2006 - 01:31 AM
Mind you, I'm no engineer (thank the stars).
#4
Posted 24 January 2006 - 02:31 AM
#5
Posted 24 January 2006 - 04:57 AM
#6
Posted 24 January 2006 - 11:50 AM
Being as I work for an elevator company, the article sparked a great deal of interest. A few questions come to mind, assuming it is eventually possible.
What if the elevator breaks down midway, how does the mechanic get there to fix it and how long would it take? How would you survive while you're waiting?
How long would the trip take and will you have to listen to "Elevator Music" all the way? I think if you did, you'd be insane by the time you got there!
I'll see if I can find the article and I'll quote some of it here.
#7
Posted 24 January 2006 - 01:50 PM
Quote
#8
Posted 24 January 2006 - 02:56 PM
The space tether where a space station is at the other end of the shaft. The idea of using a counterweight and cable wouldn't really work because the length of the cable needed would cause it to be either too heavy to lift itself or too weak. A crawler would work best.
The rack and pinion system is the way to go. The further up you go, the less gravity that is exserted. It would be slow but in a few hours you'd be in space. Coming back down would be fine at a manageble speed (under 1000 MPH) since the reason things burn up in the atmosphhere is because of the extreme friction caused by the super high speeds (mach 20+) of falling objects from space.
The problem is building such a thing since the tallest buildings in the world are nowhere near the required height.
more later.
vujsa
#11
Posted 24 January 2006 - 08:25 PM
im sorry, but your not going to build a tower 1,836,218 kilometers high... (and then some.)
the energy you are going to need to send up an "elevator" is going to be no less then sending up a rocket. AND i seriously doubt that there would be enough of anything to build that relativly stable. not to mention you would have to replace billions in dollars of satalites that would be in the thing's way.
plus some guy is going to blow it up from the base and the whole thing will come tumbling down...
#12
Posted 24 January 2006 - 09:33 PM
#13
Posted 24 January 2006 - 10:26 PM
First of all, there is no "ring of fire" as you so call it. As was mentioned in an earlier post, the only reason things burn up while entering Earth's atmosphere is because of the extreme friction resulting from falling at high speeds through the mesosphere.
Wikipedia said:
The tether would be composed of thousands of carbon nanotubes, which are able to hold enormous amounts of weight. These nanotubes would be woven one at a time by robotic "rovers" that would roll up and down the tether, adding an extra thread each time it went up or down. Although this would take awhile, eventually the tether would be strong enough to hold a lift that could carry something as gigantic as a space shuttle up to the counterweight spacestation, from which it would be launched, greatly reducing the amount of fuel necessary for it to lift off (those savings, in and of themselves, would make the cost of making such an elevator worthwhile). Elevators, whether self-powered or powered by a current running through the tether cable, would be able to move at enormous speeds, yet avoid being burned up in the atmosphere when going to or from the counterweight.
Now, the counterweight for the tether wouldn't fall to Earth if the tether snapped - that would defeat the whole purpose of it's being a counterweight. It would fly off into space and would eventually be retrieved, although it may be difficult and take quite a bit of time.
Since the elevator itself wouldn't be run by the complicated and unreliable mechanics that normal elevators are run by, they would rarely break down (and would never break down at all, if they were regularly given maintenance). The elevator itself wouldn't require any more energy to lift an object clear to the counterweight than it would take to lift the same object on an elevator completely within Earth's atmosphere the same distance. The energy required to lift the object will only decrease as the craft gets higher (since gravitational pull will decrease), and going down, little or no energy would be required at all, save to hold the elevator back so it does not descend too fast.
Contrary to what many of you have been saying, while there would be risks involved, as there always are, this space elevator would be a much more efficient and much safer means of transporting people and equipment to outer space. What would you prefer to use to get into space - an elevator that pulled itself up along an anchored tether, or a gigantic bomb that exploded downward to push you up?
In any case, I doubt anyone here has much to worry about at the moment, since such a technology, if it's ever attempted, won't be economically feasible for a few decades, at least.
#14
Posted 24 January 2006 - 11:10 PM
Ultimately what we're looking at is a huge costly project that will have little benefit, only providing us an opportunity to say "look what we can do". Right now the whole idea is what I mentioned earlier, a fairy tale. It would be hard to even write a realistic fiction on it...
But hey, this is what our society has become. We live in a world of competition. Everyone comes up with new ideas that try to out-do everyone. Heck, if we do ever make this pathetic elevator, the next thing we'll try to do is extend it to Mars, so all the little martians can travel back and forth...
#15
Posted 25 January 2006 - 08:26 PM
Quote
#16
Posted 25 January 2006 - 09:18 PM
Cool_Freaker, on Jan 25 2006, 03:06 AM, said:
Where would we be if we didn't explore some of these stupid ideas?
#17
Posted 26 January 2006 - 12:40 AM
And in order to fix a stopped lift, all one would have to do would be send up another lift after it, have some "spacewalkers" repair the lift, and then you're good to go again. Of course, that's assuming a lift would break down, which, considering how much service the lift would have, wouldn't be a problem, since it would be constantly being upgraded, repaired, etc. before being used.
#18
Posted 26 January 2006 - 01:57 AM
Cerebral Stasis, on Jan 26 2006, 11:40 AM, said:
#19
Posted 26 January 2006 - 02:02 AM
#21
Posted 26 January 2006 - 07:27 AM
Cerebral Stasis, on Jan 25 2006, 08:40 PM, said:
And in order to fix a stopped lift, all one would have to do would be send up another lift after it, have some "spacewalkers" repair the lift, and then you're good to go again. Of course, that's assuming a lift would break down, which, considering how much service the lift would have, wouldn't be a problem, since it would be constantly being upgraded, repaired, etc. before being used.
I don't believe in benefits from this, and like I said before all of this is fairy tale gibberish.
How can we possibly "save" millions of dollars? Firstly, the cost of this thing would be horrendous, and I don't believe it's free to travel up however-many-miles it takes to get to space. The whole project in itself is unsafe and would be undesireable by a majority. In addition imagine the elements this object would go through. Obviously we are aware that as we climb the elements change (weather, wind, and up 30 miles God-knows-what...) The stress just from nature's elements would be of significance.
I'm all against the stupid space studies we do anymore. Why in the heck are we sending some spacecraft to roam around Pluto??? Why not use that money to stregthen our economy? Why not halt the project and buy each American a couple loaves of bread instead? NASA is unbelievable...I wish I could blow off hundreds of millions of dollars just because I was curious about something...
Why don't we examine our own planet before venturing off onto others? I think Earth has a level of importance incomparable to anything else other than our sun...
#22
Posted 26 January 2006 - 02:58 PM
True, a lift that would climb all the way to space would cost money, but not near as much as it costs in fuel for a craft as large as a space shuttle to overcome Earth's gravitational pull. Although the tether and station would no doubt be very costly to build and keep running, over time the saved money would outweigh the original cost of construction. Thus is the reason people upgrade (in most cases) - to save money over time.
Now, as I said, if a lift stopped halfway up, another lift could be sent up after it, and a repairman in a suit and tethered to a lift could repair it within a few minutes (unless something major happens, like a motor burnout, in my opinion, would be unlikely) - far before the oxygen in the lift would run out, causing everyone inside to suffocate (furthermore, it would probably be equipped with some kind of air scrubber/recycler).
As for weather being a problem, I'm pretty sure that a tether that can hold the weight of a lift and spacecraft can withstand hurricane-strength winds, especially since it would be tethered by something as gigantic as a space station. Besides, in order for it to remain in geosynchronous orbit and not just wrap the tether around the planet, it would have to be tethered on an island somewhere along the Equator, and in that latitude (depending, of course, on which island is used), hurricanes usually aren't too much of a problem (at least *I've* never heard of any hurricanes go as far south as to the Equator).
I'm pretty sure that the idea is quite sound. It is, after all, being worked over by minds far greater than any of ours (at least in some aspects), so I'd expect that, for the most part, they know what they are doing/talking about.
#23
Posted 28 February 2006 - 05:44 AM
#24
Posted 22 May 2006 - 09:02 PM
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















