| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Member Of The Week
#1
Posted 16 July 2006 - 07:55 PM
#3
Posted 16 July 2006 - 09:52 PM
#5
Posted 17 July 2006 - 03:03 AM
#9
Posted 17 July 2006 - 12:09 PM
#10
Posted 17 July 2006 - 12:15 PM
#11
Posted 17 July 2006 - 01:49 PM
stephanie, on Jul 17 2006, 08:15 AM, said:
Well I don't think the referall system would work out. People will come make 10 posts and leave then unelss they want hosting. I do think though that it would make this place even more active because people will strive for the extra credits. I wouldn't make a 2nd or 3rd place though, put all the honor on that member but you never know. I would give the winner probably 30 credits (enough for a month of hosting)
The only problem would be what would the non members get. I can make a banner or someone could to give as well to the winner and if the non member decides to get hosting he can then recieve his reward. If not, he will recieve the banner atleast to be recognized like the hosted.
Edited by Plenoptic, 17 July 2006 - 01:52 PM.
#12
Posted 17 July 2006 - 03:44 PM
stephanie, on Jul 17 2006, 01:15 PM, said:
** IN THIS POST I AM PLAYING DEVIL'S ADVOCATE SO THESE ARE NOT NECCESSARILY MY VIEWPOINTS AND THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS **
The referral idea is in theory good but proxies would be an issue. Xman registers multiple accounts all under different IPs with the help of a proxy and the PC at school. He does this 10 times [5*10 = 50] and earns a nice, easy bonus. This would be even easier to exploit than the competition unless, like the transfer system, you need to acquire 30 credits before you can claim your bonus.
And as for the competition:
- Who? - Who would run it? Only OpaQue has complete access over the credit system so he would have to take some part in the running of it. We all know how busy he is. If a member were to run it, they wouldn't be happy sacrificing their valuable credits each week. If we made members pay a fee for the competition, then they'll soon realise it's somewhat like a lottery, give 10 and get back 1.
- Proxies - Although your average Dow Jones may not know what a proxy is, some people do and they're everywhere on the net and easy to use. All Hackzor would have to do is register a "control" account with which he'd set up a hosting account.
Then, just before every competition he'd register a new account under a proxy, become really "helpful" under he wins his 10 credits, transfer them over to the control. Etcetera, etcetera.
If members were running it, Hackzor wouldn't even need to worry about the proxy because members cannot check IPs, so a moderator would need to have some input in the competition. - Will It Work? - Are you sure the competition will be succesful in achieving one of the stated aims of increased activity? Members may be really helpful for the first few months but after they've won their prize they may "relax." That looks likely in my opinion.
- The Novelty Value - When Plenoptic kindly organized the end-of-year competition in 2005, everyone entered because it was novel and new and "wow they've never done this before" kinda thing. Repeating over and over again every week and month makes the entire thing tiresome and dull. Saving it for later makes it more exciting.
The major thing is, however, the abuse of the idea and before you say that people won't abuse the competition, ask older members about the edit button and they'll tell you they will
#13
Posted 17 July 2006 - 04:04 PM
Edit:
By the way I meant I would only taking donations for end of year so those who win can get more and people can take a bigger part of it by giving something to them. Sort of like all of Trap17 is giving them the award. But really it isn't up to me.
Edited by Plenoptic, 17 July 2006 - 04:07 PM.
#14
Posted 18 July 2006 - 11:52 PM
People who have been helpful
People who have not been warned. You cannot win if you have been warned. (just for that month)
Someone who posts a lot, but a lot of good, long, topics.
Someone who is active a lot.
And maybe more or less, but just a suggestion.
#15
Posted 18 July 2006 - 11:58 PM
#17
Posted 19 July 2006 - 08:07 AM
#19
Posted 19 July 2006 - 08:26 AM
I'm think we should have a scoring system instead. For example, a person made a tutorial or something... and someone found that's very helpful to them. They, then, can give good feedback score or whatever you guys want to call it. And at the end of each week, just add up the scores and who has the most, wins. Of course there must be some sort of limitation of giving out "feedback points" to prevent cheating. This is just an idea, so i won't give it much thought into how to make it cheat-free.
I'm sure the system will eventually evolve into a higher anti-cheating system...
#21
Posted 20 July 2006 - 01:05 AM
Quote
Indeed... what happened to that? I just got back one day and saw it missing. It didn't seem too much of a bother, so I went on my way as if nothing happened.
Anyway, interesting idea. It's kinda like the rep system before, except that you get credits for it this time. It'll probably make more people a bit more helpful. Just my two cents.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















