| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Splinter Cell Series Vs. Metal Gear Solid Series
#1
Posted 31 July 2006 - 01:05 AM
#2
Posted 31 July 2006 - 03:00 AM
#3
Posted 31 July 2006 - 04:34 PM
#6
Posted 06 October 2007 - 02:46 PM
I played all the old ones on the playstation one. They were both very great and fun to play. But they both have differed in game play. Splinter cell, to me, focused more on action stealth. Whereas Metal gear, also in my opinion, focus more on all stealth. I liked them both for different reasons. It just seemed that you got to shoot more and more action in Splinter cell, not as much in metal gear. But that might have changed in the most recent version of MG on the PS3.
#7
Posted 28 October 2007 - 07:28 PM
okay, this is what it really comes down to in the series of MGS VS. Splinter Cell
Splinter Cell is way more realistic, and it's a sneaking game. Your a guy, goes and gets information in places where he's not supposed to be, and then it becomes a story line, where the things that you have done in the mission result in news stories all around the united states. Where in metal gear solid, the guy, Solid Snake, is already IN a complex storyline, and you must aid Solid Snake throughout the levels, and must ensue long cutscenes that sometimes go up to 15 minutes, and then continue on with the story. MGS is way less realistic than Splinter Cell. In fact, you can just go around and shoot the enemies in the head. You can't even crouch in the game! There are also bosses with special powers that you need to defeat. MGS is more of a action game than a sneaking game, while Splinter Cell focuses solely on sneaking, and less on shooting, and running around. As a result, Splinter Cell has a much less complex storyline, and the longest running time of the the longest cut scene is about five minutes. Simply put, Splinter Cell is my choice, but I do play both games. But Splinter Cell is the game that sometimes I have great urges to play, while Metal Gear Solid is the type that you just choose to play.
-HOODAMAN
#8
Posted 29 October 2007 - 11:41 PM
the first time i trayed it was require hi graphic card
then and i was just bout my PC
and i see it fill on ruining a game
i was shotted
but i made allot of upgrades to my PC
and i trayed the last version
but it told me that i must have 1GB of ram at list
i hit my Head into the wall
and sowered the GOD that i will never try this game agin
#9
Posted 14 July 2008 - 05:14 AM
Splinter Cell Series Vs. Metal Gear Solid Series
Absolutly no question about it, splinter cell takes it. Sam fisher is badass and sc games are more realistic. Splinter cell d.A. Was one of the funnest games I have played.. Fisher kicks snakes ass all the way to pluto!
-reply by jman18
#10
Posted 03 September 2008 - 10:38 AM
Why?
First of all, Metal Gear was THE game that invented stealth and brought the console gaming to a whole new level.
2: Splinter Cell is a BIG ripoff.
3: Metal Gear Solid has probably the best story ever brought on videogames (mostly you're like "bleh the story is just to make it nice") but here Metal Gear IS the story (Final Fantasy comes really close in matter of best stories
4: The easter eggs! How many times I didn't play the game again just to see those easter eggs (I hope you've at least TRIED to find them before saying MGS is crap)
5: The humor is really subtle and most enjoyable.
6: WAY longer gameplay than Splinterripoff
7: Splinter Cell is just plain boring after you played Metal Gear. (YES it did play splinter Cell)
Now go buy Metal Gear and throw away Splinter cell and SHAME ON YOU if you never heard of Metal Gear!
To all my fellow Metal Gear fans: keep on gaming
Oh btw, Solid Snake is the biggest badass in gaming history
Quote
Did you even PLAY the game!? Or are you just really reta**ed, to crouch press "X" HOW DIFFICULT CAN IT BE, goddamn before you say Metal Gear sucks PLAY IT instead of just quoting other peoples cr*p .
I bet 95% of the people that say Splinter is better NEVER played Metal Gear, your opinion is worthless =_=
I'm sorry I'm rude but is pis*es me off when people just state false things and say a game sucks when they never played it...
Edited by Dragonpurse, 03 September 2008 - 10:51 AM.
#11
Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:37 PM
both are good games but they are different.
one is a more one man army type
and one is more of a stealth.
but 1 vote for metal gear solid. one of the few games that incorporated a story in the nes.
#12
Posted 11 September 2008 - 05:56 AM
#14
Posted 08 October 2008 - 06:41 AM
Splinter Cell Series Vs. Metal Gear Solid Series
SC VS MGS
Guys I have played both, and for a long time I used to think that Sc was better than MGS the reason for this was that MGS was far more difficult to play than SC, but now I think there is no other game that cane be compared to MGS. My friends and brothers who think that SC is better than MGS I would like them to just buy MGS and give it some time until they get used to playing it and then I want them to come back and post their answers here.
Reasons why MGS is better than SC.
1. MGS is far more realistic.
2. MGS has a more interesting storyline as compared to SC.
3. The cut scenes are cinematic and you don't feel like you are playing a game it feels like a movie.
4. More Gadgets and weapons to play with.
5. Humor is is great in MGS.
6. Far more harder than SC to play. This is for people who like challenges.
-reply by Khesraw
#15
Posted 20 February 2009 - 05:50 AM
Now to Dragonpurse I think you need to relax dude, the guy you were talking about was talkin about crouching and moving at the same time, in Metal gear you cannot stay crouched you will end up crawling on your stomach. Now Metal Gear is a good game but I have to go with splinter cell, I have played both games but splinter cell takes the cake because its more realistic. Metal Gear Solid 3 is realistic but up to a cirtain point I found it cool that you could heal your wounds and dig out bullets but that was more of a jungle area, now in splinter cell its more of a tactical thinking area you infeltrate and area pick locks interogate people(I kno interrogation can be done in MGS also) hack into computers, keypads, and retinal scanners. It deals with operation more on the inside MGS deals with out side areas, and you get more Hi-tech Gadgets instead of Metal Gear, Metal gear has a bigger variety of weapons but in splinter cell you get special goggles that can have Night Vision, Thermal Vision and EMF(Electro Magnetic Feilds) all in one you also get and OCP that comes with your FN 5-7 Pistol which they call the SC Pistol the OCP can jam cameras and lights for a short while and you get a Hi-tech Gun with attachmetns(in Double agent its more attachments).
-reply by Spike#16
Posted 08 March 2009 - 01:10 AM
Metal Gear Solid is a fantastic game, it's a work of art rather than a work of propaganda which Splinter Cell is, Splinter Cell is so politically cliche it's disguisting, one dimensional characters, and just bland storytelling. The game is fun for a short time, but the entire setting is so drab it's laughable. Snake is a well rounded character, while Sam fisher is a nobody perhaps only to fanboys. To further the point of one of the earlier posters, most of the people stating MGS is worse than Splinter Cell haven't played the game, one of the proponents for Splinter Cell even stated that prior.
"So even without knowing what Metal Gear is, I'm going to say thatSplinter Cell wins, because I've only found one or two games that beatIt." He argues my point for me here. Splinter Cell is a hollow series, Metal Gear Solid always seems to churn out works out art.
-reply by Robert Bradley#18
Posted 21 April 2009 - 09:44 AM
But in Metal Gear its just not realistic to put a box over your head and pretend the guard doesn't see the same box in a different location and wouldn;t notice. That's just stupid.
But I heard when they bring out the new Crysis, [this is after Crysis Warhead] it will involve a stealth feature similar to Splinter Cell, yes it already has cloak. But NPC's will react to scenarios and sounds made by the Character. More interactivity = more fun. Good on Crytek.
I wonder will that splinter cell: conviction ever come out. lol
Edited by cicala, 21 April 2009 - 09:45 AM.
#19
Posted 30 June 2009 - 03:03 AM
Damn why are you guys making me choose between the TWO BEST GAMES EVER! I really don't want to choose because I am very protective about these two games..But if you put a gun to my head and made me choose one it would have to be Splinter Cell!!
-reply by Antonio SmithKeywords: splinter cell vs metal gear solid#20
Posted 02 July 2009 - 06:36 AM
MGS FTWOk first off, mgs started and mastered the stealth element of gameplay biggining in the early 80's. So without mgs, no splinter cell. Mgs will go down as one of the greatest and most memorable franchises in the history of gameing. No exaggeration. Mgs4 is the greatest game ive ever played. Ive yet to find a flaw. IGN gave mgs4 A PERFECT 10. IGN has only given out around 5 perfect ten games since the original zelda. Mgs has the best and most entrancing story lines i have ever experienced. Splinter cell is a horrible cliche mgs ripoff that has had a drawn out and sub par catalogue of games come out since the original. And to the guy that said sam could kill snake? snake would tranq him and slit his throat while he sleeps. All while smoking his favorite brand of cigs. MGS NO CONTEST-reply by XxBIGTIMBERxX
#21
Posted 02 August 2009 - 05:55 AM
... Ugh.. This is a waste of time, there are Fan boys of both series that would kill each other over this question. Having played and beaten all recent update to the series. I'm going hands down to MGS, Much more enticing story line with actual depth and character development. Splinter Cell while being very enjoyable, I found the story and characters to be very hollow and cliche. Hideo Kojima loves easter eggs and giving to his players, creating awesome memorable moments,and adding onto the series' replayability. Splinter Cell is turning into the action movie cliche, betrayed and now revenge. I am looking forward to the new Splinter Cell, but I will enjoy the games on a different level, Comparing it to MGS4 will most likely kill off splinter cell if you think of it in that comparison. What is most likely and probably sadly true is that, those of you who are saying Splinter Cell most definitely beats Metal Gear Solid probably have never played through the series. Either that or your just a fan boy with a rod stuck up your ***. I enjoy both games. Just don't compare them.
#22
Posted 03 August 2009 - 08:54 PM
#23
Posted 08 January 2010 - 04:14 AM
Ok, for those people who say Metal Gear Solid isn't realistic, and isn't a 'real' stealth game. Have you even played MG? ._." and if you have, I bet your one of those people who didn't even finish the game, let alone touch the 'Extreme' Difficulty setting... I mean of course, the game has some fictional elements in it, but so does splinter cell.
Don't get me wrong, SC is a great game, and I did enjoy playing the series. But when it comes down to it, MG is just more fun. I played MGS3 2 times and MGS4 4 times, trying to get all discover all the easter eggs ( Big Boss Face Camo, anyone? ) But after one play through of SC:the, I felt like I've had enough. The extra unlockable equipment was not worth the 2nd play through
@Alex Cicala and people who say MG's AI is worse than SC, I bet you never played pass the easy difficulty setting, because I can assure you. The AI of MG is far superior of SC. You can't just hide in a cardboard box, it isn't that easy anymore. The enemy's sense of sight and sound increase by tenfold, and suddenly everything isn't so 'fake' anymore.
@squeaky and others who say MG doesn't require that much stealth, MG requires way more stealth than SC. Just put up the difficulty and you'll find that what I'm saying is the truth.
@Jman18 and everyone one who says SC's story is more 'realistic', Yea, fine. The story of SC is more realistic, I'll give you that. But who said realistic was better. Is there some sort of rule? If the more realistic, the better. Then games like Bayonetta, Prototype, Batman:AA, infamous, Metroid, Rachet and Clank and Final Fantasy must be sh*t. (Just some unrealistic games of the top of my head)
-reply by BIg Boss#25
Posted 11 February 2010 - 07:00 PM
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















