... Ugh.. This is a waste of time, there are Fan boys of both series that would kill each other over this question. Having played and beaten all recent update to the series. I'm going hands down to MGS, Much more enticing story line with actual depth and character development. Splinter Cell while being very enjoyable, I found the story and characters to be very hollow and cliche. Hideo Kojima loves easter eggs and giving to his players, creating awesome memorable moments,and adding onto the series' replayability. Splinter Cell is turning into the action movie cliche, betrayed and now revenge. I am looking forward to the new Splinter Cell, but I will enjoy the games on a different level, Comparing it to MGS4 will most likely kill off splinter cell if you think of it in that comparison. What is most likely and probably sadly true is that, those of you who are saying Splinter Cell most definitely beats Metal Gear Solid probably have never played through the series. Either that or your just a fan boy with a rod stuck up your ***. I enjoy both games. Just don't compare them.
| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Splinter Cell Series Vs. Metal Gear Solid Series
#22
Posted 03 August 2009 - 08:54 PM
#23
Posted 08 January 2010 - 04:14 AM
Ok, for those people who say Metal Gear Solid isn't realistic, and isn't a 'real' stealth game. Have you even played MG? ._." and if you have, I bet your one of those people who didn't even finish the game, let alone touch the 'Extreme' Difficulty setting... I mean of course, the game has some fictional elements in it, but so does splinter cell.
Don't get me wrong, SC is a great game, and I did enjoy playing the series. But when it comes down to it, MG is just more fun. I played MGS3 2 times and MGS4 4 times, trying to get all discover all the easter eggs ( Big Boss Face Camo, anyone? ) But after one play through of SC:the, I felt like I've had enough. The extra unlockable equipment was not worth the 2nd play through
@Alex Cicala and people who say MG's AI is worse than SC, I bet you never played pass the easy difficulty setting, because I can assure you. The AI of MG is far superior of SC. You can't just hide in a cardboard box, it isn't that easy anymore. The enemy's sense of sight and sound increase by tenfold, and suddenly everything isn't so 'fake' anymore.
@squeaky and others who say MG doesn't require that much stealth, MG requires way more stealth than SC. Just put up the difficulty and you'll find that what I'm saying is the truth.
@Jman18 and everyone one who says SC's story is more 'realistic', Yea, fine. The story of SC is more realistic, I'll give you that. But who said realistic was better. Is there some sort of rule? If the more realistic, the better. Then games like Bayonetta, Prototype, Batman:AA, infamous, Metroid, Rachet and Clank and Final Fantasy must be sh*t. (Just some unrealistic games of the top of my head)
-reply by BIg Boss#25
Posted 11 February 2010 - 07:00 PM
#26 Guest_yigen_*
Posted 13 September 2011 - 02:23 PM
Splinter Cell is more like a tactical espionage simulation game, characters, equipment, actions and the storyline are not very different from real world.
You don't encounter superhumans, mechas, sci fi stories etc, and when you get two bullets you are dead.
On the other hand Metal Gear series are stealth action games that include things you can not encounter in real world, sci-fi storyline, psychic, cyborg or superhuman enemies, mechas, robots etc...
These two games reflect the different philosophy of Japanese and Western games. Japanese audience for the most don't like over-realistic simulation games, they prefer fantastic plots and gameplay fun over realism. Did you consider why there isn't any realistic flight or military simulation made by Japanese.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














