OJ Simpson will be explaining how he would have killed his wife and her friend 12 years ago, if he had done it, which, the premise is, he didn't (even though everyone knows he did).
Let me say it again. He will be recording a detailed documentary on how he would murder his late wife and her friend. That's like being interviewed on how you would murder your dead mother or something. It's quite freakish, and it's all on the Fox News Network.
After the interview, he will soon thereafter be releasing a book on the subject.
Is this how murderers get treated these days? They walk away without jail time (although he did pay 33+ million in compensation fees to the families of his wife and her friend) and later make big bucks telling the story of how they committed the murder and got away with it.
There are hundreds of news articles buzzing about this. Take your pick and read it.
| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
How Oj Simpson Did It
Started by Cerebral Stasis, Nov 15 2006 07:14 PM
16 replies to this topic
#3
Posted 16 November 2006 - 05:59 AM
Yeah...haven't we all heard enough of this bozo??? I mean...seriously! We've ALL seen the grizzly footage and fotos of the crime scene and victims. We ALL watched the trial from beginning to end and we ALL know exactly what happened.
For those of you that think justice was not served, I kind of disagree. For what it's worth, the case itself was grossly mishandled by the prosecution and THEY got exactly what they deserved, a Not Guilty verdict. Had I been on the jury, I'd have found exactly the same thing given the really *BLEEP* evidence chain and witnesses presented. It was a bad case, poorly investigated and poorly prosecuted. They left too much room for doubt and that sealed the deal. The clincher for me was telling OJ to put on the glove used to commit the murder....stupidest stunt EVER and it cost them the trial.
So yeah, given the case presented, OJ got the correct verdict. But that doesn't mean he didn't do the crime...and in the Civil case, they did finally show in a coherent fashion that he was at the very least responsible for their deaths. Simple common sense tells you who did it....and his behavior after the trials (I'll never rest until I find the killers...T time is at 10 tomorrow, right??? LOL) nailed that coffin nice and shut.
So we know who did it, when and how. The only mystery left at this point is how he FELT before, during and after. And I'm not setting myself up to get an honest answer in the fake scenario he's setting up for this book deal. I'm going ot wait until he's a totally broken, old man and finally breaks down one day from the guilt of it all and tells us ALL how haunted he's been ever since the day he cut his wife's head off. That will be worth 30-45 minutes out of my day.
For those of you that think justice was not served, I kind of disagree. For what it's worth, the case itself was grossly mishandled by the prosecution and THEY got exactly what they deserved, a Not Guilty verdict. Had I been on the jury, I'd have found exactly the same thing given the really *BLEEP* evidence chain and witnesses presented. It was a bad case, poorly investigated and poorly prosecuted. They left too much room for doubt and that sealed the deal. The clincher for me was telling OJ to put on the glove used to commit the murder....stupidest stunt EVER and it cost them the trial.
So yeah, given the case presented, OJ got the correct verdict. But that doesn't mean he didn't do the crime...and in the Civil case, they did finally show in a coherent fashion that he was at the very least responsible for their deaths. Simple common sense tells you who did it....and his behavior after the trials (I'll never rest until I find the killers...T time is at 10 tomorrow, right??? LOL) nailed that coffin nice and shut.
So we know who did it, when and how. The only mystery left at this point is how he FELT before, during and after. And I'm not setting myself up to get an honest answer in the fake scenario he's setting up for this book deal. I'm going ot wait until he's a totally broken, old man and finally breaks down one day from the guilt of it all and tells us ALL how haunted he's been ever since the day he cut his wife's head off. That will be worth 30-45 minutes out of my day.
#5
Posted 16 November 2006 - 09:58 PM
Well, it certainly makes one wonder if "if *insert event here* happened, I would *insert action here*" books will become commonplace, especially describing how one would murder someone for something they may have done? It certainly looks like a decline for the world of literature.
And I thought that even Emo poetry was too much to handle...
And I thought that even Emo poetry was too much to handle...
#7
Posted 19 November 2006 - 05:07 PM
I can't believe you can do an interview like that. The name of that interview is basically just changing the statement "How he did it" to "How he would have done it" I think that is very messed up and personally I think the man should go to jail. I guess the only reason he is doing this is because his case might not be able to be brought back up in court (cant remember the word for that lol) but I think its messed up that he will be making money off of a murder he commited.
#9
Posted 20 November 2006 - 06:48 AM
It is funny because his book is almost telling everyone he did it. And there was so much evdence yet he is inoccent. :\ its just weird but he is guilty. Why else wuold he make the book. I havn't seen or read the book but heard alot. I think he is almsot saying he did it. Because i heard it has every thing in the book like how it happened a few years ago.
#10
Posted 20 November 2006 - 07:07 AM
well not only does he have no shame about coming out with the book and interview combo, but even though he was demanded to pay the 33M or whatever, its been reported that he hasnt paid anything at all.
not to mention the fact that hes getting paid 3.5M for the book, and all that money will either be transferred through a 3rd party, or will be sent into an bank account overseas, so that the feds cant do anything about it.
oh yeah, and im going to write a book called 'if i got my girlfriend pregnant'
itll be about how i would have gotten my gf pregnant, if someone who didnt look exactly like me and had my same DNA hadnt done it first.
anyone want a copy?
not to mention the fact that hes getting paid 3.5M for the book, and all that money will either be transferred through a 3rd party, or will be sent into an bank account overseas, so that the feds cant do anything about it.
oh yeah, and im going to write a book called 'if i got my girlfriend pregnant'
itll be about how i would have gotten my gf pregnant, if someone who didnt look exactly like me and had my same DNA hadnt done it first.
anyone want a copy?
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















