| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Windows Media Player 11 Visualization
#1
Posted 15 December 2006 - 04:23 AM
Normally I would just accept this and keep saving for a new computer but the second that there is something covering even part of the visualization screen, it ups it's performance. If you put a separate window over the vis screen (even the slightest corner of a window) the performance ups to a good level and the CPU usage will drop from about 80% to 30%.
This has had me confused and I was wondering if anyone else had seen this.
#2
Posted 15 December 2006 - 07:04 AM
My laptop, however, (2.2GHz, 1024MB RAM) has integrated graphics and yet can still display the visualisations fine, even when I am running multiple other, quite intensive, applications. Presumably this is down to the extra RAM compared to the 256MB I have on my old desktop.
#4
Posted 31 December 2006 - 04:31 AM
However I may have a solution, I experienced this when I just bought my Graphics card. I did not install the drivers yet and when I clicked and held onto the scrollbar in my firefox, it was lagging tremendously bad, it took 2-3 seconds for it to move down. After I installed my graphics card driver, the problem was fixed. I think you should try looking for your graphics card manufacturer and install the driver of that particular model.
I am not going to install WMP 11 in my notebook though, in fact I am not going to install anything new from Microsoft (IE 7, Microsoft Office 2007, WMP 11 .... etc) till 2 years after Vista's release so that there not be any unnecessary bugs.
PolZegerully, on Dec 15 2006, 04:26 PM, said:
This is my first time on this site.
I would like to tell what I really like the topic "Windows Media Player 11 Visualization".
I've been reading it for a while, and I have learned so much here.
So, I decided to try my luck asking a few questions...
How can you IM, PM or whatever you call it to certain members? .
I'd like to ask more questions about this project.
By the way, nice domain name www.trap17.com.
Welcome to Trap17 forums!
You can PM other members by going to the my controls link at the top-right hand side or through this link http://www.trap17.co...-controls.htmle
From there, you can click on compose a new message or go here http://www.trap17.co...ew-message.html and you just need the nickname of the person you want to PM and type in your message. There! You are good to go
Edited by darran, 31 December 2006 - 04:32 AM.
#5
Posted 04 January 2007 - 05:56 AM
#8
Posted 05 January 2007 - 03:38 AM
I like iTunes more. Easier to keep your collection of music, video, podcasts etc organized. Not everytime loading that library. Just one library with links to the songs in the library in the playlists.
And the visualization is not that memory-intensive and pretty nice. Very simple.
#9
Posted 06 January 2007 - 06:00 AM
Thanks for the tip on updating your video driver, I got this computer a few months ago, surprisingly updating the drivers never crossed my mind.
And yea I know you can turn off the visualizations but sometimes it's relaxing just to stare at them until you are dizzy.
And as for switching media players, I have come to like the WMP 11 interface, and non of the others are are good. I am sure itunes is a good media player, and i hate Microsoft as much as the next guy but I hate apple even more.
#10
Posted 06 January 2007 - 06:43 PM
Quote
I can't stand itunes either, the way it wants to convert your files all the time... but I still don't see why people want things to look all shiny and stuff... oh well, each to their own trade
#11
Posted 12 January 2007 - 02:11 AM
must have something to do with the way the WMP11 works. I am planning on buying a new video card before too long, I am pretty sure that it will fix this problem along with some poor game play I have been putting up with.
I finally got a new video card and the problem is gone. But it still confuses my as to why covering just a couple hundred pixels would make such a dramatic performance increase. Nothing like that is visible now, now increase on CPU usage or decrease in quality.
#12
Posted 21 February 2007 - 03:03 AM
This new one with 512 has been no problem with multiple softwares running all at the same time. Especially with the graphics stuff.
Just thinking about going in to view the SOTW made my old one slow down.
#13
Posted 21 February 2007 - 03:08 AM
laforgej, on Feb 20 2007, 09:37 PM, said:
I just came up with the idea that maybe since WMP is a 'background' process when not having the focus, it gets more power. I've found background tasks to run faster than foreground ones, like extracting an archive with 7-Zip.
#14
Posted 27 May 2008 - 03:14 AM
#15
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:36 PM
I have had the same problem with itunes viz's. I noticed that when I scrolled my mouse over it and kept moving, it worked fine, but when I didn't, it lagged like there was no tommorow. This problem became too much and I uninstalled itunes. This has never happened with wmp 11 for me however and I encourage you to contunue searching for a solution.
#16
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:05 AM
I'm running a P4 1.8 ghz with 512mb of ram, with an integrated GPU (S3 ProSavage DDR). Clean install of XP w/ SP3, including latest install of DirectX. Same business - ONLY with the "Battery" visualization does the visualization slow down unless the mouse arrow is over it. With the "Alchemy" and other visualizations it's fine. I did however note that on a Google search, some mouse suite software (ico.Exe) had been mentioned to affect the performance of some programs using DirectX. On my machine, I uninstalled the mouse suite, restarted the machine, and guess what? Still the same issue- going full-screen on the Battery visualization (or even non-full-screen) results in the visualization running slowly and choppily unless you had a mouse arrow over it. It still doesn't happen to the other visualizations. I do have a dedicated graphics card coming in the mail and if I can re-find this thread I'll post whether it fixed the problem. Yeah, I know - why should I be bothered by such a thing when I could just use another visualization, or another player, etc... Well, simply put, I expect things that I pay for to work the way they're supposed to. - And because I love solving problems, I look for answers. Will let you all know what I find out.
-K
-reply by Kevin
#17
Posted 29 December 2009 - 03:30 AM
As we all know, iTunes can only transfer the files to iPod. Recently, our computer crashed and all of the files on iTunes was gone, but they are still in my iPod. I spent over 6 hours trying to find out how to transfer my ipod files to my PC and the empty iTunes. I thought it would be a good idea to make a tutorial for iPod fans who was confused by how to transfer songs, videos, photos and playlist etc. From iPod to computer or iTunes! hahaa I tried a third party software name Cucusoft iPhone/iTouch/iPod to Computer Transfer to extract the songs, videos, photos and playlist etc. From iPod to computer or iTunes. Software: Cucusoft iPhone/iTouch/iPod to Computer TransferSupport iPod: iPod/iPod Nano/iPod shuffle, also iPhone and iTouch It can help iPod fans to transfer iPod songs, videos, photos and playlist backup to PC or iTunes that iTunes can not do when solve you encounter the following familiar problems: When your computer crashes down, your files on computer and iTunes was gone; When you buy a new PC, you want to transfer your iPod files to your new computer; When you like your friends iPod songs and want to transfer them to your computer; When your friends want your iPod songs and videos to his/her computer; When you have a new iPod and want to transfer iPod video and audio between them; When you want to transfer the files between your iPod/iPhone or your friends' iPod/iPhone; Share two different iPods on iTunes; ...
more:http://www.Converter...r-Transfer.html
-reply by markyoyoReply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















