| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
What Is... Deja Vu.
#21
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:01 PM
#23
Posted 15 February 2007 - 03:45 AM
#24
Posted 17 February 2007 - 02:45 AM
Anyway, someone once told me what they belive deja vu is and I think it's the best explanation for it that I have heard.
The brain thinks quicker than our nerves and senses and sometimes if our sense send information to our brain in two parts, such as YOUR RIGHT HAND JUST TOUCHED AN OVEN, then it sent THE OVER IS HOT. You move your hand away, though it takes a second due to this sensory delay. Also, some senses are faster than others, for example touching something hot automatically makes you withdraw your hand but trying to press the stop button when the screen goes red (like on reaction tests).
So, say one sense says WE ARE IN THIS SITUATION, your brain reconginses this and logs it in memory, then ANOTHER sense says WE ARE IN THIS SITUATION your brain loads it's memorys (though it has no idea how old they are) and goes, WOW, we've beem here before.
Therefore, under this theory, deja vu (in most cases, of course the whole dream thing is not explained) is merely a sensory 'delay' as our brain goes to quickly...
That was quite hard to explain, do you all understand what I mean?
#25
Posted 17 February 2007 - 05:21 AM
well I know few friends who talks about past lifes, matrix stuff and things about dejavu's explanation, I just had one question for them.. "did you find it out by yourself or you just simply believe what other people said when your mind said 'hey it's a nice explanation' ? ", so how about it.. ?
I agree with something u said hybridsystem, we simply often decide something by our memory or past experience (sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad -how good or bad is relative- ) when doing, facing and act on things..
#26
Posted 19 February 2007 - 11:41 PM
A clinical correlation has been found between the experience of déjà vu and disorders such as schizophrenia and anxiety,[9] and the likelihood of the experience considerably increases with subjects having these conditions. However, the strongest pathological association of déjà vu is with temporal lobe epilepsy. This correlation has led some researchers to speculate that the experience of déjà vu is possibly a neurological anomaly related to improper electrical discharge in the brain. As most people suffer a mild (i.e. non-pathological) epileptic episode regularly (e.g. the sudden "jolt", a hypnagogic jerk, that frequently occurs just prior to falling asleep), it is conjectured that a similar (mild) neurological aberration occurs in the experience of déjà vu, resulting in an erroneous sensation of memory.
It has been reported that certain recreational drugs increase the chances of déjà vu occurring in the user. Some pharmaceutical drugs, when taken together, have also been implicated in the cause of déjà vu. Taiminen and Jääskeläinen (2001) reported the case of an otherwise healthy male who started experiencing intense and recurrent sensations of déjà vu on taking the drugs amantadine and phenylpropanolamine together to relieve flu symptoms. He found the experience so interesting that he completed the full course of his treatment and reported it to the psychologists to write-up as a case study. Due to the dopaminergic action of the drugs and previous findings from electrode stimulation of the brain (e.g. Bancaud, Brunet-Bourgin, Chauvel, & Halgren, 1994), Taiminen and Jääskeläinen speculate that déjà vu occurs as a result of hyperdopaminergic action in the mesial temporal areas of the brain.
The similarity between a déjà vu-eliciting stimulus and an existing, but different, memory trace may lead to the sensation. Thus, encountering something which evokes the implicit associations of an experience or sensation that cannot be remembered may lead to déjà vu. In an effort to experimentally reproduce the sensation, Banister and Zangwill (1941) used hypnosis to give participants posthypnotic amnesia suggestions for material they had already seen. When this was later re-encountered, the restricted activation caused by the posthypnotic amnesia resulted in three of the 10 participants reporting what the authors termed paramnesias. Memory-based explanations may lead to the development of a number of non-invasive experimental methods by which a long sought-after analogue of déjà vu can be reliably produced that would allow it to be tested under well-controlled experimental conditions.
Interesting isn't it?
Edited by BuffaloHELP, 20 February 2007 - 12:40 AM.
#28
Posted 15 December 2009 - 12:33 PM
Lobosque, on Dec 22 2006, 09:54 AM, said:
Here it goes:
Yes that's right....Once when I was in pre-school a girl punched me in the face when I went down a slide......I remembered that girls face in the back of my mind apparently. She was in my 6th grade class and when I saw her I thought I have seen her somewhere. So my mom (my mom was the recess teacher in my prehschool and she saw the girl hit me) pointed out that she hit my in prehschool. That is a feeling of Deja Vu not when you realize that the person is the person from a time, but when you think you know them. Deja Vu is an extremely wierd thing.
#29
Posted 05 April 2010 - 12:12 AM
Well I've recently seen fringe and it presents you a rather curious and higly [background=#ffffff" title="hipotetica]hypothetical explanation to deja vu. So, there is a theory that for every choice we make an infinite number of diferent realities are created containing each and every single one a diferent turnout of events leading to an infinite number of realities. Ok then according to this theory deja vu is a glimpse of a diferent reality where that event has already happened, giving you the impression that, that already happened.[/font]
[background=#ffffff" title="hipotetica]Of course it is a fiction theory but who knows, there are still many secrets in the universe that we haven't discovered, but it is a really cool and curious theory. [/font]
[background=#ffffff" title="hipotetica] [/font]
[background=#ffffff" title="hipotetica]Ok now a little off topic, [/font]hybridsystem I don't really believe in God by the christian or any other realigious ways because they are all based of faith and not on facts, and I really cant believe in something that I can see. Now I am more [background=#ffffff" title="susceptivel]susceptible that there is a being or an entitie that we refer to as "God" that made everything possible, but for now I really do believe in science and that everything began in the Big Bang. [/font]
[background=#ffffff" title="hipotetica] [/font]
-reply by meandmyselfReply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














