| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Silly Mistake In Awarding Credits
Started by OpaQue, Jun 28 2007 07:54 AM
14 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 28 June 2007 - 07:54 AM
Hello Members,
It had come to my notice that we have distributed the credits to our members who have posted 12 hours before the ceremony time.
I apologize for this mistake. I had to take a long drive on that very same day and I had requested Yratorm to open the topic at 5:30 IST PM instead of AM.
The credits would be added to the members again.
Initially, I was ignoring this issue because I didn't expect so much of dissatisfaction by some members. Also, I have been working on a new clustering project for a client's site. The credits awarding thing is a very time consuming task.
Velma was made in charge of distributing the credits and I apologize to her for the inconvenience she has to go through due to this. Giving her this additional task along with the Sales burden she has (from Computing Host) is really going to be tough for her.
Additional Credits would be given to the members who posted after 00:00 GMT.
For those members who received credits before this time, We will subtract it back. These same members who have NOT posted after 00:00 will get 25 bonus credits. (Just in case to avoid any heavy credit LOSS and to keep their hosting active).
I apologize once again for this silly mistake from my part.
Sincerely,
Trap17 Management.
It had come to my notice that we have distributed the credits to our members who have posted 12 hours before the ceremony time.
I apologize for this mistake. I had to take a long drive on that very same day and I had requested Yratorm to open the topic at 5:30 IST PM instead of AM.
The credits would be added to the members again.
Initially, I was ignoring this issue because I didn't expect so much of dissatisfaction by some members. Also, I have been working on a new clustering project for a client's site. The credits awarding thing is a very time consuming task.
Velma was made in charge of distributing the credits and I apologize to her for the inconvenience she has to go through due to this. Giving her this additional task along with the Sales burden she has (from Computing Host) is really going to be tough for her.
Additional Credits would be given to the members who posted after 00:00 GMT.
For those members who received credits before this time, We will subtract it back. These same members who have NOT posted after 00:00 will get 25 bonus credits. (Just in case to avoid any heavy credit LOSS and to keep their hosting active).
I apologize once again for this silly mistake from my part.
Sincerely,
Trap17 Management.
#2
Posted 28 June 2007 - 08:17 AM
aww... my creds are going to be deducted
oh well. i could still make it up anyway. no problemo. i think this would be more beneficial to those who were supposed to get the right amount of credits. fine with me really. it's not a big deal.
Edited by master_bacarra, 28 June 2007 - 08:17 AM.
#3
Posted 28 June 2007 - 09:20 AM
Well i dunno if i posted before or after that ( i dunno the server's time). But if i loose some credits its ok i'll just make it up
. But i hope i get those extra credits XD
#4
Posted 28 June 2007 - 11:51 AM
Well I posted before 12, realised the mistake and then posted again after? Do I not get any credits at all? I thought the ones before 12 would be deleted, and I didn't want my congrats to go
#5
Posted 28 June 2007 - 02:42 PM
Well, I will make sure everyone is happy and no one loses too many credits :-)
#7
Posted 28 June 2007 - 04:29 PM
Simply following the rules as they were laid out is the only fair thing to do. Anything else irritates some of us. Yes, I was one of the complainers. I hope you don't take that to mean we complainers are ungrateful or wish ill of you or the Trap staff, we're just sticklers for following rules and not changing the parameters after the event has begun. I think I speak for all the complainers when I say we're delighted to be hosted here, delighted at the anniversary event and we were very happy with the prospect of free credits for the occasion. As for the extra work Velma has to do, I'm not going to be too sympathetic because the posts we made were all edited to show post #1, #2, #3, etc. and St. Mike said he'd send in a list to reflect the members who posted and how many credits they should get. I was satisfied that all was in order and others were as well. That's why it was such a shock to us when we didn't see the credits that we were expecting show up in our accounts. Imagine our irritation after spending all that time waiting and talking about it in the shoutbox. Anyway, I'm glad she finally told you, Shree, and I'm glad you're setting things right. I hate for this event to leave a bad taste in anyone's mouth just because someone couldn't do the right thing in the first place.
#8
Posted 28 June 2007 - 05:14 PM
I think Velma, although t is a pressurable job is doing such a great job! Opaque is also right up there spending a LOT of time making everything work and function in an enjoyable and reliable way!
Velma actually did award me my credits as correctly after the initial confusion, but then I ended up giving them all away for the Jimmy's 100 credit challenge lol!!!
I think it's awesome you guys decided to sort this matter out. Personally the 25 bonus credits is completely fair and more! those who forgot to post after should be so grateful, even though their credits went up and down again!
Velma actually did award me my credits as correctly after the initial confusion, but then I ended up giving them all away for the Jimmy's 100 credit challenge lol!!!
I think it's awesome you guys decided to sort this matter out. Personally the 25 bonus credits is completely fair and more! those who forgot to post after should be so grateful, even though their credits went up and down again!
#9
Posted 28 June 2007 - 08:13 PM
Well the other problem was that the credits where rushed to everybody because people kept on asking when they were going to get them, and so that is why the credits where rushes as they were. I know I told a few people once this started that it was put together in the last minute with little organization and so when I was writing all the names down, I was going to wait until we got enough people listed (top 40 or top 50) before sending it out, so it could be done in one shot instead of doing it over time. Although the blame game could be started, just too many things where happening all at once which made this more confusing.
So with this topic made it should help out in someway I guess.
So with this topic made it should help out in someway I guess.
#10
Posted 29 June 2007 - 03:12 AM
The problem with adding credits is that the Credit system requires member's "username". Many members have set a different display name instead. So everytime, the credits are added, some attempts would be rejected because it will not accept the username (as its the display name). In that case, the real username has to be fetched from the database to make the changes :-)
She has almost finished building the new list and credits will be adjusted most propably by today. I got a copy of Vista as Gift yesterday.. (Very tempted to install it).
Anyways, Things have been very cool so far and our projects are running smoothly now. Qupis is now much more stable and balanced. (the site which literally gave me nightmares because of spamming, phishing etc.)
She has almost finished building the new list and credits will be adjusted most propably by today. I got a copy of Vista as Gift yesterday.. (Very tempted to install it).
Anyways, Things have been very cool so far and our projects are running smoothly now. Qupis is now much more stable and balanced. (the site which literally gave me nightmares because of spamming, phishing etc.)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked











