sylenzednuke, on 18 December 2007 - 09:03 PM, said:
Well, if you're speaking of light being transformed into another form of energy, I haven't a clue of that as Physics is something I am definitely weak at. But the only way let's say light gets "sucked" is in the case of Black Holes. The reasons; let's get to them later. Recreating a Black Hole is impossible on Earth, so for now your Dark Bulb won't be something plausible I guess. We can't recreate the gravitational pull to suck in photons traveling at a speed of 3x10^8 m/s so light cannot be "sucked" into anything. If light is bombarded onto the bulb, depending onto the material, it might reflect or retract or scatter, nothing that would make it get "sucked" into anything. We require humanely impossible to recreate gravitational force and then let's say something 'unknown' to have light sucked into it. We don't really know what exactly happens to light inside a Black Hole, so until we can't figure that out, we won't be able to figure this out either.

Well yesterday this subject was brought by my 7 year old daughter Gaby, and the best solution we came up was that since light is transmitted by photons, the best way to get rid of light will be by designing a lamp that produces anti-photons. But since anti-photons are the same photons, and we are dealing with visible light, that is low-energy, for most part, the photos will pass right by each other, producing no effect. If i remember it right in the rare case that they will collide with high-energy, they will produce an electron-positron pair, where a collision on low-energy will produce a little light-on-light scattering. But still I think that the best way will no be to suck photons, but to annihilate them. Good luck, we spend a nice time fantasizing what this technology will allow, and the funny situations it will produce. @ernestojmoreno on Twitter