Jump to content



Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest , Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply w/o Sign-Up!
- - - - -

Byet Host Is Bad!


39 replies to this topic

#1 jlrr94

    Newbie [Level 3]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts

Posted 06 January 2008 - 04:26 AM

I used to use Byethost, they offered a great service 250MB of storage, good bandwidth, scripts installer,support add-on and parked domains, and a lot more but one day they just decided to change the upload limit to 1MB!!! So I wasn't able to upload anything by my Joomla installer, I decided to leave that hosting and now I'm looking for a good hosting and I think Trap17 is my choice...I just need to wait to get my account :)

#2 indrazam

    Newbie [Level 2]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts

Posted 30 January 2008 - 04:38 PM

I tried their hosting a long time before... I liked them. But lots downtime. Their bandwidth and disk space is good. However they are still one of the few web hosts (FREE) which survives! In the free-webhosts site there are lot of messages about how fast they are now... But I think i will go for trap 17...

#3 Amiel

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 111 posts

Posted 14 February 2008 - 10:30 AM

Yes! Byet host is a bad host for me because I dont really know what's their purpose... lol... They offer good services although they are a little bit slower. I think Byethost is a unfriendly site. Their cPanel thingy there is themed with Vista which is very yucky. I didnt like it. Trap17 is better than that Byethost!

-Amiel

#4 kobra500

    Inane and Inept

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK - Kent
  • myCENT:97.63

Posted 14 February 2008 - 11:29 AM

Hmm well trap176 is brilliant and its what I use. Until I need or can afford payed hosting but that'll be a while yet. I also fnd because you are required to post on the forums any problems you have a quickly sorted out!

#5 apacheNewbie

    Newbie [Level 2]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPip
  • 29 posts

Posted 18 February 2008 - 10:10 PM

View Postkobra500, on Feb 14 2008, 12:29 PM, said:

Hmm well trap176 is brilliant and its what I use. Until I need or can afford payed hosting but that'll be a while yet. I also fnd because you are required to post on the forums any problems you have a quickly sorted out!

My first of impression of Byet Host is good. It offers big storage and bandwidth capacity.
Its cPanel is nice.

Byet Host does not install complete add on for PHP though. That's mean many classes in certain framework (e.g. Zend Framework) will not work.
That's why I move to Trap17 :P

However, I do not know about its speed. I only use it to test my PHP application.

#6 elhadi

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 104 posts

Posted 12 March 2008 - 01:48 PM

Yes byet host is bad because vista panel
i like cpanel

#7 Coolguy

    Newbie [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • Pip
  • 19 posts

Posted 12 March 2008 - 03:51 PM

Well good call my friend ..I was just about to switch to that site to check out its features ...

Good thing I noticed this topic before I registered in Byet Host...


So I think Trap17 is the best when it comes to web space hosting ...Then I rather stick with this site then go to Byet Host ..

#8 AlphaOfDoom

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 136 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wisconsin - U.S.A

Posted 13 March 2008 - 03:05 AM

I'm sticking with trap17 100% but I also get some other hosts for other site reasons and stuff.

I have a friend that uses this host, I have seen no problems yet but who knows, I don't like the domain with byethost in it...I don't know why..

#9 Erdemir

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Istanbul, Turkey
  • Interests:Interested in Mechanical Engineering

Posted 12 May 2008 - 09:46 PM

A webhosting should provide cronjob and fsockopen() php function enabled. But byethost and other free hosting providers do not provide these. I think these functions are too important. I have a forum site. And I want to watch the RSS from my website, but it requires fsockopen() function. Byethost has more bad things for example my website on byethost was frequently redirecting to another blog sites because of maintenance they say.

#10 Wang

    Newbie [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • Pip
  • 14 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • myCENT:5.13

Posted 30 May 2008 - 09:16 PM

Byet Host Is Bad.
For the most part, i agree with your opinions.

I like php + mysql + cpanel

Edited by Wang, 30 May 2008 - 09:18 PM.





Reply to this topic


This post will need approval from a moderator before this post is shown.

  


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users