| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Is Electronic Music Not "real" Music?
#1
Posted 16 January 2005 - 12:09 AM
I find that many people put down dance music feel that any music not made with real instruments is easy, that anything made on a computer or software like Pro-Tools couldn’t possibly be anywhere near as credible or skilful as music made with real, live instruments. Do you find this to be true?
There is so much absolutely beautiful, moving and “tuneful” electronic music out there. So much of dance music is cutting edge in its sound, there’s something distinctly fresh and evolving with its beats and its melodies; to me electronically made music seems to be burgeoning on an ever expanding future of discovering new sounds. To me the computer is an instrument in itself; able to create new sounds that cannot be made with live “analogue” instruments.
So is there any truth to the opinion that electronic dance music isn’t real music? Is the credibility in the making of the music or in its sound?
#2
Posted 16 January 2005 - 12:22 AM
#3
Posted 16 January 2005 - 04:50 AM
I think the major difference between electronic instruments and other instruments (strings, woodwinds, drums, etc) is that in electronic instruments the sound that is produced was already pre-recorded or predefined whereas in an instrument such as a guitar there is much more of a personal "touch" that defines the sound. What I mean by all this is that with the guitar there is a much more "real" interaction between the musician and the instrument at the moment a note is played. The sound that is produced by the guitar is often refered to as more "real" because it depends on the intention of the musician at that moment (i.e. the characteristics of the sound produced depends on how the guitarist strikes the strings). I think the reason why a lot of people prefer live bands with traditional band instruments is because they feel as though it is a more "real" connection.
However, you could argue that anyone that is playing any sort of instrument, and thereby interacting with it, is creating a very real and unique music.
In my opinion, I think what it all really comes down to is preference. People just prefer what they prefer, I guess.
Oh and I just want to say that this is a challenging topic to write about and I would enjoy any criticism or additions.
#4
Posted 16 January 2005 - 08:58 AM
The important thing to remember is that no matter what form music comes in its main purpose is to entertain. Well, I hope I didn't confuse you even more with my ramblin'...
Take Care,
Amadeus Mozart
#5
Posted 22 January 2005 - 05:02 AM
byrdhouse, on Jan 16 2005, 08:58 AM, said:
The important thing to remember is that no matter what form music comes in its main purpose is to entertain. Well, I hope I didn't confuse you even more with my ramblin'...
Take Care,
Amadeus Mozart
#6
Posted 22 January 2005 - 05:06 AM
you guys all have really good points. and to even look at what a live musician does in these days is programmed.. in the studio anyway
i mean if ya buy a cd ...an artist will go in...record a riff...if that riff is good...he can loop that riff....so he doesnt have to play it again
same with drums and bass
even some vocals or background vocals
so how true is live musicians albums as opposed to a "electronic" album
there is a very fine line between what is real and what isnt anyway
#7
Posted 25 January 2005 - 02:44 PM
The thing is music has turned to be quite electronic, I feel.
I have done some recording in a studio....and have observed some being done.
It's like there's nothing real in there. Even the singing can be changed completely.
They can put vibrato (even when the singer can't do it) by just telling the computer to do it. Or if anyone goes out of tune, just moving their mouse ,the controller can tune on the computer. So singers don't even have to be good.
Or.....alternatively, you can sing one sentence. Then have a break, and sing another one sentence and have a break. Soo...it's just not real when we come to know what's behind it. (so I would say I prefer live music)
#8
Posted 25 January 2005 - 07:00 PM
Quote
I wonder how long it will be before they can do this in real time. In such an application the computer would correlate the song to the known piece of music figure out what note the person is signing and adjust the pitch accordingly.
#10
Posted 02 June 2009 - 07:27 AM
I rekon electronic dance music is just as good as normal bands , as a synthersizer and vst's etc used to make the sounds are just todays instruments people say its to computerized or whatever and its not natural and that everything these days are done with computers bla bla but if the computer and synthesizers and other electronic music tools/ instruments was invented bak when the guitar and other instruments were invented then poeople would of used it to make music back then as it owuld of been anohter instrument tool to make music every year and generations etc things change more things get invented that we would never think of could ever be invented all these tools are just the new age instruments just because they wernt made in the old days doesnt not make them instruments or not good I love all music bands included veryt alented how they perform live but all music is good not just live acts , plus alot of producer play piano and do perform remixes and songs as a live act sometimes haha
#11
Posted 02 June 2009 - 07:59 AM
I think electronic music is just as good as music made by live bands as the computer and synthersizer and other new electronic devices are the new age instruments and tools and the sounds they produce are just as powerful and meaningful as other instruments people complain and say its not real its to computerised or whatever but as generations and years go past new inventions and tools etc are made that poeple could of never imagined computers and other programs and electronic instruments vst's etc are just the new age instruments if these inventions were made bak when guitars and other insturments were made then people would of definately used these tools to make msic it just because they wernt made bak then that poeple didnt use them its all music no matter what genre every1 should appreciate it I still love live bands and how talented it is to perform live but alot of producers do play piano in real life so they tend to remix and perform on the synthesizers in real time live and if it wasnt for electronics live bands wuldnt be able to perform there music in front of thousands or put out albums worthy for good speakers
#12
Posted 02 June 2009 - 10:49 AM
I prefer lots of artists such as Jimmy Hendrix, or John Mayer, Guns n' Roses, and the sound of clean guitars and creative songs. Yes, there might be some kind of amazing electronic or computer made songs, but live and original songs created by instruments give you some real good self satisfy. I play guitar myself and I preferably like guitar based songs. Imagine some songs such as Nothing else matters just nowadays sound cool.
#13
Posted 02 June 2009 - 03:21 PM
Some people resent the fact that a lot of music is sampled.
Sampling means rehashing previously recorded music.
Some say for integrities sake all music should be recorded completely
new. It's never a perfect world though.
Too much sampling leads to repetition and not only that,
somebody can use an orchestra from a computer keyboard,
without knowing the first thing about playing a musical instrument.
A lot of musicians resent this.
#14
Posted 02 June 2009 - 04:49 PM
The most appealing thing, in my opinion, about techno/electronic music is that it is easy to hide mistakes and make them sound good. You don't have to be a musician, you just need to be good with manipulating sound programs (or know someone who is).
There's my two cents on the issue. Take care, folks!
Edited by Fractured.Logic, 02 June 2009 - 06:45 PM.
#15
Posted 02 June 2009 - 05:57 PM
#17
Posted 24 December 2009 - 11:15 AM
This is an awesome topic. All I am going to add is that you should check out the NewZealand band Shapeshifter!
They are absoloutly amazing especially live. They are a 5 peice band using guitars, saxophone, synthesizers and have an actual drummer playing drum and bass type beats.
don't let the fact that I threw "Drum and Bass" in there throw you off because there music which once did fit into that category is now more a heavy soul/tribal/roots type sound.
Being a very electronic band means people who are into electronic type rave music where you would usually being watching a couple of dj's and people who prefer traditional rock type bands can both find the experience that is Shapeshifter a truly amazing experience.
There are a lot more bands emerging like this one so don't be afraid to go to gigs with bands you've never seen before because it can open a world of music you never knew existed
-reply by AaronNZ#18 Guest_Brian_*
Posted 05 March 2011 - 07:25 AM
I mean look at what daft punk has in their pyramid:
http://digitaldj.fil...aft_pyramid.jpg
Look at how "the Prodigy" makes music
http://www.nekozine....9/sofcheck3.jpg
Scooter:
http://3.bp.blogspot...10+Awards+4.jpg
Here are some instruments that can be used to make electronic music as well
Moog Voyager XL
http://keyboardmag.c...s/VoyagerXL.jpg
Moog Taurus
http://cdn.synthtopi...nth-porn-hd.jpg
Moog Modular synth, and dont tell me it doesnt take any skill or "connection" playing these
http://www.marksmart...og/MoogCrop.jpg
Roland Modualar
http://www.soundonso.../roland11.l.jpg
Point made, all genres take skill to make
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















