Jump to content



Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest , Please Register here to get Your own website. - Ask a Question / Express Opinion / Reply w/o Sign-Up!
- - - - -

What Do You Think About The Lhc Experiment?


21 replies to this topic

#1 FreedomOverdose

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 103 posts
  • Location:Albania
  • Interests:Programming, design, animation, 3d-modeling, rubik cubes, electronic gadgets etc

Posted 06 September 2008 - 10:52 AM

what do you think about the LHC experiment which covers a large area?

if they make a black hole then we're gone before we even know it
might not concern you since you're too busy playing wow and *edit and warned by jlhaslip* but I'd hate for these nerds to destroy everyone's life just to please their curiousity , we all wanna know what's going on when there isn't risks involved
some say it's completely safe some say it's the end of the world and if it's the second I'm grabbing a Silenced Gun and some C4 and heading down there

oh and by the way , it's gordon freeman who's in charge , Halfe life was nothing but a prophecy and it's true

Posted Image
Notice from jlhaslip:
Profanity removed. This site deals in General Audience Standards. Your comment warrants a warning.


#2 shadowx

    Live your life so that in death you may stand side by side with your gods. Not at their feet.

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Essex, UK
  • Interests:Photography is a big interest, i have some photos up at my site, apex photographs (http://apex-photographs.com). Using my Lumix g1 to take the photos of course! <br /><br />Um computer games... photo editing and thats about it!
  • myCENT:68.57
  • Spam Patrol

Posted 06 September 2008 - 11:15 AM

Oh man i love the "end of the world" conspiracy.... people dont seem to understand the vast energies and masses required to start a black hole. I dont fully either, technically no-one does but i know this: To make a black hole you would need to squeeze the sun down to something that could fit in your hand. Then you would have a blackhole (maybe my numbers are off, but you get the idea) and if you can make a machine on earth that can do that, then yes, you are going to end the world.

It started as a joke, a geeky joke, and now people believe it! Its silly! They crash two particles together, create plenty of energy and some new matter, or a particle called the god particle (so called because they think it was the first matter to ever exist) no-one is in danger unless you happen to be sleeping inside the thing.

#3 HyBriD54

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 125 posts

Posted 06 September 2008 - 11:52 AM

Haha creating a black hole.
Thing is, though, they're not really trying to make a black hole. They just want to see what happened straight after The Big Bang. They're interested in how our universe formed. And hey, aren't we all? It's always interesting to read scientific theories as to how our universe appeared out of nowhere.
I doubt CERN (the ones doing the project) can create a black hole. Unless you look at the Dan Brown version of CERN, I don't think they'd have the equipment to create such massive gravitational forces.
More intriguingly, though, in a black hole something strange happens to space and time. Maybe you survive the black hole and end up in another era. Like, in the time of the dinosaurs or maybe in the Year 5000. It would be pretty cool if it wasn't for the fact that the Earth would no longer exist in the future because we'd just compacted it into a black hole. As for going to the past, well, bringing a computer and a plasma screen TV and a Mercedes Benz and a passenger plane to the time of the Ancient Romans would probably make them think we're their Gods.
And we could try out the Grandfather Paradox. You know, the one that says you can't travel back in time because then you can kill your ancestors, preventing you from being born.
I wouldn't mind going through a Black Hole if it meant I could go back to the past, as long as I had people and weapons with me - I don't want to face Sabre Toothed Tigers all by myself. Going to the future scares me. Maybe because of all those stories about how mankind is going to get so powerful it's going to overwhelm and destroy itself. And my comparatively useless machine guns and F-34s and nuclear bombs probably aren't going to do much to protect me.

#4 travstatesmen

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 119 posts
  • Location:Auckland, New Zealand
  • Interests:This forum account is dual-managed by a husband and wife team. <br /><br />Statesman of Travian: I play the Travian MMOG on the .com servers, and I run the Statesmen of Travian clan.<br /><br />Radio Chick: I am into radio and have been a breakfast show host, I enjoy meeting people and talking intelligently on a wide range of subjects.

Posted 06 September 2008 - 10:49 PM

I don't really think it is any more dangerous than what J. Robert Oppenheimer1 did with the Trinity test2 back in 1945. Back then there was talk about it being the end of the world too! People thought that Oppenheimer would start a fission reaction that would just go on forever, igniting the atmosphere and destroying the Earth3. I have to agree with shadowx on this. Conspiracy theories will abound wherever there is a lack of knowledge. But the Large Hadron Collider experiments4 are all about pushing the boundaries of scientific knowledge, just like the experiment known as the Manhattan project5 was. They pushed the boundaries of science then too. But Enrico Fermi6 was quick to realize that a supercritical fission reaction (an uncontrolled explosion) would be more use in the world that he lived in at that time, rather than a critical fission reaction (controlled chain reaction). So too, I fear, that the scientists of the LHC Experiments may also take the results of their work and turn it into a bigger, badder bomb than the ones released on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The problem, to my mind, is that science for purely scientific advancement of knowledge is not possible because it is not self-funding. The scientific community have to get their funds from somewhere in order to make all this whiz-bang technology available to the scientists so that they can run their experiments. Funding of that nature normally comes from the Government, and the Government therefore feels that they have the right to benefit first from any advancements made by the scientists, as the Government becomes a key investor and stakeholder in the experiment at hand. Therefore, if there is any opportunity for the Government to gain pecuniary advantage from the results of said experiment, then they will pounce on it. This, I believe, is why we saw the first commercial nuclear power plant built in 19567, some 11 years after the same technology was used to obliterate Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I'd hate to see what the Government will make out of the findings of the LHC Experiments! And, yeah, I'm not saying whose Government or where. There are enough conspiracy theories around already! :)
[hr=noshade]References
1 http://en.wikipedia....ert_Oppenheimer
2 http://en.wikipedia....ki/Trinity_test
3 http://en.wikipedia....est_predictions
4 http://public.web.ce...LHC/LHC-en.html
5 http://en.wikipedia....nhattan_project
6 http://en.wikipedia....iki/Enrico_Ferm
6 http://en.wikipedia....wer#Early_years
[/hr]

Edited by travstatesmen, 06 September 2008 - 11:40 PM.


#5 pedro-kun

    Member [Level 1]

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 71 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal

Posted 06 September 2008 - 11:46 PM

Loved the joke about Gordon Freeman xD

Anyway, you can't create a "stable" black hole unless you grab something as massive as 1.2x (or 1.4x) the mass of our Sun... The "black holes" created by the LHC will be so transitory that many of them will be created and evaporate in just one second.

People often talk without knowing a damn thing about what they are talking about... Mis-information is bad :(

#6 jopak134

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 317 posts

Posted 07 September 2008 - 03:51 PM

well i know of this one and there are activist and debates going aroung the world. well in my opinion, this is like experimenting with a human but way worse. one false move can destroy the earth and even the planet.

stephen hawking the one in the wheel chair or the smartest in the world. tells us that microblackholes will not harm us. but how if his wrong and something happened. then were all dead.


well they say that we will not die instantly but we will be sucked to the center of the black hole.

whatever happens is for the worse i say.

#7 shadowx

    Live your life so that in death you may stand side by side with your gods. Not at their feet.

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Essex, UK
  • Interests:Photography is a big interest, i have some photos up at my site, apex photographs (http://apex-photographs.com). Using my Lumix g1 to take the photos of course! <br /><br />Um computer games... photo editing and thats about it!
  • myCENT:68.57
  • Spam Patrol

Posted 07 September 2008 - 05:30 PM

Nothing bad will happen!

The absolute worst that can actually happen is that the LHC powers down, or some idiot walks in with a metal thing in his pocket and it gets thrown about by the magnets.

There is no possible way that it will create a blackhole of any kind big enough to do any damage. I dont even think it can create a black hole. A black hole is simply a very very denser ball of matter. Imagine the earth squeezed down the size of a marble. That is what a black hole is (but bigger and with more mass) Its just a very dense ball of material. The gravity is very concentrated because it has (in my example) the same gravity as the whole earth but in the size of a marble, so there is the same amount of gravity but in a smaller area so it feels stronger, it is more intense. This gravity is so intense that nothing can escape it. The most powerful rocket in the universe could not "take off" from within a blackhole. The gravity is too strong. The reason it is black is because light is sucked into it. Gravity bends and distorts light, and in a black hole the gravity is so strong it pulls light in to, making it appear black and like a hole.

The LHC is not capable of doing that. Stephen hawking himself showed us that black holes "evaporate" that is, without sucking in new material a blackhole will vanish into nothing. So even if the LHC did create a black hole (which it cant -- read on) it would evaporate in a micro second. So even if this blackhole was the most powerful on ever seen in the universe (which it wouldnt be) it would only be there for a microsecond because its so small so it wouldnt be able to do any damage.

Do you know what the LHC does? It simply crashes one particle (of which there are millions, perhaps billions in this one full stop : . ) into another particle. It will also do this with small groups of particles (eg tens, or hundreds, still so small they wouldnt be visible to the human eye or any optical microscope). When these particles collide they produce large amounts of energy, when i say large i mean relative to their mass. So this isnt dangerous. If the worst happens then perhaps it springs a leak. Big deal. If the absolute worst happens a few scientists die. Not the end of the world (though still not good!). all that happens is the biggest magnets in the world pull the particles around in a circle. So power down one of the magnets and it shuts down.

This hype about "oh we are all going to die" is absolute rubbish and its really annoying. Scientists arent retards, they know the world isnt going to end. These experiments have being going on for decades. True this is the most powerful one so far but none of the others have even came CLOSE to endangering the world and neither will this one. Its all rubbish.

Quote

According to the well-established properties of gravity, described by Einstein’s relativity, it is impossible for microscopic black holes to be produced at the LHC. There are, however, some speculative theories that predict the production of such particles at the LHC. All these theories predict that these particles would disintegrate immediately. Black holes, therefore, would have no time to start accreting matter and to cause macroscopic effects.

from: http://public.web.ce.../Safety-en.html

Edited by shadowx, 07 September 2008 - 05:38 PM.


#8 innosia

    Super Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 238 posts
  • Interests:Programming in PHP and .NET (include website development). Has much skill experience in most uses programming languages.

Posted 08 September 2008 - 06:43 PM

Wah, I just heard that people is going to make a black hole. How is it anyway?
I personally don't know much about black hole, but black hole is believed created from a collapsed star. If the Lhc experiment is success then maybe the black hole can eat the city, hehe jokes, I think that they are professional, and they must have done all their home work so that anything bad will not happen. And I believe such an experiment is important since we don't know much about this black hole thing until we have our own one.

#9 shadowx

    Live your life so that in death you may stand side by side with your gods. Not at their feet.

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Essex, UK
  • Interests:Photography is a big interest, i have some photos up at my site, apex photographs (http://apex-photographs.com). Using my Lumix g1 to take the photos of course! <br /><br />Um computer games... photo editing and thats about it!
  • myCENT:68.57
  • Spam Patrol

Posted 08 September 2008 - 07:40 PM

It is impossible for the LHC to create a black hole. Absolutely impossible. As you said black holes are made by collapsing black holes. That is the only way we know of to create a black hole. So if the LHC can somehow CREATE matter equal to the mass of 2 or 3 times our sun's mass then yes. It could create a black hole. But lets remember that if it did somehow make this matter it would engulf the earth in a fiery hell that would mean the end of life before a black hole was even formed.

Then of course, if the LHC made a black hole the pink fairies would grant 3 wishes upon the pigs who would of course choose to taste like dung, be resistant to black holes and be able to fly! :)

#10 travstatesmen

    Advanced Member

  • Kontributors
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 119 posts
  • Location:Auckland, New Zealand
  • Interests:This forum account is dual-managed by a husband and wife team. <br /><br />Statesman of Travian: I play the Travian MMOG on the .com servers, and I run the Statesmen of Travian clan.<br /><br />Radio Chick: I am into radio and have been a breakfast show host, I enjoy meeting people and talking intelligently on a wide range of subjects.

Posted 09 September 2008 - 06:56 AM

View Postshadowx, on Sep 9 2008, 07:40 AM, said:

It is impossible for the LHC to create a black hole. Absolutely impossible. As you said black holes are made by collapsing black holes. That is the only way we know of to create a black hole.
Ah, so is that the definition of a black hole then? A self-negating contradiction? Or shall we just assume that you meant to write: "black holes are made by collapsing stars"? :) I personally think that the quote above is quite novel, even though it is clearly a mistake. And now that I have it quoted, even if you decide to edit your post, I still have captured it for posterity! Thanks for keeping us informed, educated, ... and entertained shadowx!




Reply to this topic


This post will need approval from a moderator before this post is shown.

  


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users