68 replies to this topic

[eiteljoh]

Have never really paid much attention to desktop suites, but built my first linux box and threw Open Office www.openoffice.org onto the computer and it's awsome. I don't see why all small/mid size companies and individuals would ever buy MS again. I'm just as happy to download a better office suite for free than to buy one for $200. Really getting sick of microsoft.....

[bjrn]

eiteljoh, on Feb 4 2005, 12:08 PM, said:

I don't see why all small/mid size companies and individuals would ever buy MS again.

Because if you would have a company, I'm sure you would like to read and write the same documents that your subcontractors/clients/etc use.

Last I used OpenOffice it was far from perfect in dealing with MS formats, and if you have a business you can't send a customer a document with strange formatting. So you use MS Office, because all the other companies and clients are using it.

It does suck that MS doesn't release their document specs, but it's just the way it is.

[Taupe]

eiteljoh, on Feb 4 2005, 11:08 AM, said:

I don't see why all small/mid size companies and individuals would ever buy MS again.

You're right : that's why more and more compagnies and administrations drop M$ Office and use instead OOo.
OOo format will be the official format in Europe.

[CodeName_88]

I never tried using Open Office, but I heard it's pretty cool. I only ever used Microsoft Office, which suits me well enough.

[joshua132]

I use OpenOffice.org because it is free. It is important to note that I only use it for word processing; it is nice that it can save into the MSWord format that is standard. Although I have not test OOo's version of Powerpoint, Excell... I would not trust OOo with important projects in those area's simply because compatibility with MS's programs is not guaranteed.

[yomi]

I have used openoffice.
But others use ms word, so I have to use word.
Once a time I write a document in OpenOffice, and opened it in word.
The ms word die!
And even reinstall ms office is useless.
At end , I reinstall the whole system.
Terrible.

[T100]

The Asian language support of OpenOffice still needs improvement. But for European users, I think OpenOffice is the best substitute for M$ Office. OpenOffice even comes with integrated pdf maker, which means that you don’t even have to pay for Acrobat. And there is a swf generated, also saving you money for Flash. OpenOffice has another advantage: It is compact. Unlike the gigantic M$ Office, it can be run on older computers.

Actually, I don’t really see why some businesses still let M$ suck their revenue. People are already using the LAMP system, Linux + Apache + MySQL + PHP gives the best server platform in a low cost. It is more stable and more efficient than M$ server 2003, so why spend money to buy something of an inferior quality? Perhaps so businesses are too lazy to adapt to a new platform. But their laziness costs them money, and they will be urged to change soon…

[yomi]

wow, pdf maker is integrated into openoffice?
Good news, now I can turn back to OpenOffice.
Asian language support is just well for use.

We buy windows because there is some service deveopped in windows.
There is not enough linux programmer here.

[s243a]

Can you convert open office documents to LaTeX. In word if you use Mathtype when you can set the preferences so when you save to text the formulas will be converted to LaTex. I think some of the Visual Basic Macro features of words could be handy if I better new how to utilize them. Does open office have similar features?

[karlo]

Me, I will use Microsoft Office. Because I really know it well.

[xboxrulz]

I'm happily using OpenOffice on my SUSE Linux 9.2!

xboxrulz

[eiteljoh]

I've never thought about it until now, but I guess it's going to become pretty important in the future to have some form of standard for documents, spreadsheets, etc. It would hopefully be in XML and the suite app that opens it would interpret it. Would make a lot of sense ... not sure, there may be some work going on for this now.

In a few years, it'd be nice to see other companies being able to really compete with Microsoft ... they've sucked the blood out of too many companies and people. I shouldn't be talking like this, as I hold some M$ stock ... but they're not going anywhere either.

[Shackman]

Open Office as cool. The best part is that it is free. It is also a very small download as compared to Microsoft's Office suite. But as it goes, Open Office is definitly not as powerful as Microsoft's. Open Office still needs a lot of improvements and new features before it goes main stream.

-Shackman

Edited by Shackman, 06 February 2005 - 05:06 AM.

[google_byte]

I think OpenOffice is great too. There are cons too though. Like I think it seems slower than Microsoft office on my comp. It takes a while for me to open it up. Do you guys experience this problem? BTW I was wondering how I can get rid of that border around my document when I open up writer. I also agree with shackman. Open Office still needs a lot of features even though it is improving all the time.

[Hamtaro]

It's also slow on my computer. It takes a while to open documents. I also didn't know it had a pdf maker, and all that...Maybe I should look at it more. Maybe if I do, I'll find even more stuff. Well, it is FREE, so don't expect too many features for it. I'd still rather use it than MS Word, though. I hate Word (Don't know why, I just do).

[xboxrulz]

It runs fast and swift on Linux, it takes only 1 minute of loading.

OpenOffice 1.1.3 (KDE version)
SuSE Linux 9.2 (kernel-2.6.8-default)

xboxrulz

[bjrn]

xboxrulz, on Feb 6 2005, 09:52 PM, said:

[OpenOffice] runs fast and swift on Linux, it takes only 1 minute of loading.

One minute? oO

There are very few applications I will allow to take one minute to load, and a word processing application is definitely not among them.

[moldboy]

I primarly use MS office simply because that is what I started using. I hear that the new version will have much better support for shapes and microsoft in general. I do have OOo installed and use it on the linux computers at school. It is quite slow, that I must say. I like the equation editor in OOo, something I don't think is availiable in MS yet (correct me if I'm wrong)

As far as a standard file format appeatrly OOo 2.0 used the open document format rather then the sx* format. And I believe that it is XML based.

I would (and have) recomend it to friends who can't/don't have the ability to use MS office.

Even if something happens to OOo in the next few years, it has definatly started to make MS sweat, just like the Gmail in the world of email!

[Odyssey]

I do hear that Open Office is a really neat Office suite. But I think I will stick with Microsoft Office because it took me a really long time for me to learn all of the features that it offers.

But I will try Open Office, and see what it offers, from the looks of it, it seems like people enjoy using Open Office.

[Kiko_Way]

I'm a bit lost, so Open Office is the Linux version of Microsoft Office? I am getting Linux soon so I have not used Linux- ever...

[Inspiron]

Open Office is NOT the Linux version of Microsoft Office..
It's just that OpenOffice is free and Microsoft Office is a paid-to-use software...
Since Linux is a free and opensourced Operating System, therefore it also using all other free sources of software that also operatable on Linux..
So Linux becomes 100% free with all software included...

Unlike Microsoft, you buy Windows Operating System without software included..
On top of that, you still need to purchase them to use on Windows Operating System..
Furethermore, Windows Operating System is a very good target for virus writers to write and destroy user data on Windows OS..

So Linux is always the better choice in the case where it is free to use and still quite free of virus..
However Linux is not quite good for business that does publication, because it's open-sourced so people can edit to suit their requirements and so there are alot of "standards" out there...

[JaVe]

So what, in my opnion, microsoft office will always (and is now better) better than open office. Sure, open source is better in ways but open office in terms of formatting the text etc. loses points - i havent used it in ages but i remember i didnt like it. I use microsoft office now, oh well.

[LeAnn Rimes My Angel]

I have used Open Office 1.0, and it was nice to have a program that was backwards compatible with Microsoft Office. However, it was/is not a elegant. Not a big deal, but the alternative is a good option if you prefer to have something legal.

I have a copy of Microsoft Office 2000 Premium that I use, and I see no point in ever updating it to anything else as long as it works.

[minimcmonkey]

Microsoft office is undoubtedly the beter of the two;
open office has several drawbacks:

-textured backgrounds look terrible, animated dont work properly.
-Lots of the animations wont work.
-It also doesnt have a good clipart.
-It has a feeble attempt at wordart, but looks nothing like as good
-the autoshapes arent as good

they are just end result looks drawbacks.

but there are many more drawbacks.

Microsoft office works a lot faster on my PC.

But considering the price, is it really worth paying so much for something which you can get a nearly as good version of, for free?

[rtoot3]

For all of you saying that you cant send other people documents because its not the same as theirs, yes you can actually. theres a number of things you can save it as, and one of them is .doc for sending it to peoples with Microsoft word. also something that i think is cool about open office is that you can export powerpoints(actually called open offic presentation) as flash objects.