I choose Athlon cause they are in many ways better ,Cheaper and more reliable ( in my opinion ) i want to make love the founder ( or his daughter
| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Anthlon Vs. Pentium
#4
Posted 06 February 2005 - 04:03 PM
and let me ask u something....
If a credit card company sends you an add in mail ( just one )
And a totally diferrent one sends u mail with a diff add WOULD CONSIDER THAT SPAM.
SPAM = MULTIPLE ADS/WRITTEN DOCUMENTS FROM THE SAME SOURCE
#6
Posted 07 February 2005 - 11:26 PM
Spam- Unsolicited junk email,generally advertising for some product sent wide-scale to a mailing list or newsgroup. There are a number of ways you can find yourself on a spammer's email list, including signing up for newsletters that sell lists of their clients' email addresses, listing your email address on a webpage or newsgroup, or even by choosing an email address that spammers may be able to guess.
i dont see how LOL and BRB are spam, you're just not allowed to post "lol" as a reply. i dont think anyone will post "brb" unless there stupid
post with 2-3 words are not allowed on the forum. you're confuzzing forum rules with the word spam.
I just made a Topic Athlon Vs Pentium and accuse me of spam
http://www.trap17.co...file-no-16.html - best processor "COMPANY" <<<------- even i know u can read Posted Jun 18,2004
http://www.trap17.co...ile-no-314.html - POSTED JULY 24 2004!
"Which "COMPANY" u like better?
rite now AMD has the edge over intel with there 64 and FX series..." he asked
AND I PLAINLY AS CLEAR AS DAY I SAID "Which Processor do you like better?"
Keyword "PROCESSOR" NOT COMPANY!, Also they are a total of 2, ONLY two, post's that faintly ressemble mines.
The Admin Posted in both of those and not once did he mention any rules broken.
And you posted in those topics also " xboxrulz " and not once did u say, that they were, as you so cleverly put it, "spam"! I've said my 2 cents
#7
Posted 08 February 2005 - 01:45 AM
2. http://www.trap17.co...le-no-2526.html
3. http://www.trap17.co...le-no-4192.html
4. http://www.trap17.co...le-no-3703.html
5. http://www.trap17.co...file-no-16.html
Since you knew how to search, why didn't you do it beforehand? How do you think others feel answering and posting the same things over and over again?
So you think asking for Pentium vs Athlon is any different than asking AMD vs Intel??
So if I ask you if Pizza Hut is better than Dominos you aren't going to compare the pizza they make? Come on... Now please do not carry on this pointless discussion.
#8
Posted 08 February 2005 - 03:54 AM
the post i mentioned were talking about the company as a whole and all there products........i was only talking about a product both companies make.
THOSE THINGS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH MY POSTS WHAT SO *BLEEP*IN EVER.
" What processor do you like for gaming " - WTF that Has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY POST............. ur just looking for anything that talks about processors.....
try a little harder man...ALOT harder
they were posted a year ago also
#9
Posted 08 February 2005 - 05:16 AM
Have you actually read through any of those posts I linked to? In all cases you are giving me only the first few lines or posts. They are about the topic you posted no matter how they are worded. There are more which I didn't bother linking.
And if pizza is the last thing you think of when someone asks if Pizza Hut or Dominos is better, then I have nothing more to say.
#10
Posted 11 February 2005 - 01:06 AM
#12
Posted 15 February 2005 - 01:39 AM
I believe that pentiums adververtisement its most simple, because it uses the primary GHZ format rather than Athlons secondary, complicated understanding of the ways.
But then of course Athon is a lot more cheap than pentium.
And then of course, pentium is lightyears ahead of techonlogy,
But of course, Athlons recommended for gaming (in which i am a gamer)
Oh yea! Pentiums got a cool snazzy logo!
Pentiums better !
J 2 da MBOT
#14
Posted 22 February 2005 - 08:56 AM
Don't fight over what is spam there are people assigned to see to stuff like that. Did you ever wonder how it would feel to go to vote for your favourite processor and find people quarreling over spam? (Although it was fun to read)
I like Athlon excellent price to performance ratio in the performance market (Although Duron is the best overall). Barton is not that good. The best arch was Throughbred B. Barton clock lags a lot and its cache doesn't help it much.
The worst part about AMD is no SSE3. I feel ashmed to see the comparision chart of a Celeron D and an Athlon64. Athlon has to eat Celeron dust. Can you believe it???
#15
Posted 22 February 2005 - 09:12 AM
...A 64 3800 ( which is not too expensive) is better then P4 3,46 GhZ EE (which cost more then 1000$)....so thereis no doubt who is better....
and AMD's FX-55 is the most powerfull desktop processor....so Intel has no chance..for now
#16
Posted 24 February 2005 - 04:42 AM
And don't tell Intel doesn't have any chance. Forgot what happened to GeForce6800 when Radeon X800 stepped in??? Intel has already registered the trademark for its 64bit dual core proc (Intel VIIV).
You never know what's cooking in the foundry!!!
#20
Posted 05 March 2005 - 12:49 PM
There is only one thing I don't like in AMD > the fact that they have released 2 different sockets 754 and 939 - every one of tyhem have there own CPU but when they released the 754 their said that it will have a short life. Well it seems they changed their minds since they've lunched a couple of new semprons for this platform. I really miss the days when there was only one platform Socket A ...
#22
Posted 07 March 2005 - 11:34 AM
Last resort for Pentium fans was that Athlon is not as stable as Pentium,which they claim is rock solid.
I have Athlon XP 1700+,overclocked to 2000+,and it works just perfectly for over 2 years. I am saving money to buy Athlon 64,as it is the future of computers in next few years. Some of my friends who have alredy bought Athlon 64,paired with Socket 939 motherboards are more than satisfied with it. Also,at most computing forums here in Serbia everyone is just talking about news about Athlon 64,new motherboards for it,overclocking of Athlon 64,and almost no one mentions Pentium processors anymore.
I agree that price of Atlons has gone up lately,and cheap Semprons don't deliver as much as they should,but 64s rock the house.
It's ironic that I am typing this on a Intel Celeron 1,7 GHz system at work,which is unbeliveably slow.
#23
Posted 07 March 2005 - 07:14 PM
Davor, on Mar 7 2005, 05:04 PM, said:
Last resort for Pentium fans was that Athlon is not as stable as Pentium,which they claim is rock solid.
I have Athlon XP 1700+,overclocked to 2000+,and it works just perfectly for over 2 years. I am saving money to buy Athlon 64,as it is the future of computers in next few years. Some of my friends who have alredy bought Athlon 64,paired with Socket 939 motherboards are more than satisfied with it. Also,at most computing forums here in Serbia everyone is just talking about news about Athlon 64,new motherboards for it,overclocking of Athlon 64,and almost no one mentions Pentium processors anymore.
I agree that price of Atlons has gone up lately,and cheap Semprons don't deliver as much as they should,but 64s rock the house.
It's ironic that I am typing this on a Intel Celeron 1,7 GHz system at work,which is unbeliveably slow.
#24
Posted 12 March 2005 - 05:20 PM
Because my dad needs one for his buisness crap, and I need one for my gaming crap, so I'm giving him this one and I'm getting a new one...easy enough?
So fair nearly everyone has said AMD so I think I will go on it, I'm not too familar with the processors, whats currently the best one out other then the 64's.
And how much are they?
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














