It has a new Turbo Boost, which honestly is more than just an advertising scheme. I tested it out for a few minutes and let me tell you all, there isn't a tiny difference in speed. No, not at all, because there is a HUGE increase in speed.
I ran a few tests on different webpages and despite the results, they are not altered or exaggerated. I ran both on Ubuntu 9.04 using Swiftfox 3.5.2, and Opera 10. I'm using n Dial-Up.
Here are my results. Swiftfox was started in SAFE mode, disabling all extensions and eliminating any possibility of excess lag. Opera was of course, a fresh install. Images were enabled. Turbo Boost was enabled on Opera. Cache was erased in Swiftfox. Time measured is from typing in the URL and pushing enter, to complete loading of the page (When it says DONE)
http://www.trap17.com/forums/
Swiftfox - 1min 46 seconds
Opera - 24 seconds.
http://www.yahoo.com
Swiftfox - 3 min 18 seconds
Opera - 1min 3 seconds
http://www.xisto.com
Swiftfox - 2 min 52 seconds
Opera - 1 min 20 seconds.
Now, Opera's Turbo Boost works by server side compression of things like images. This means that when Turbo Boost is enabled, images are noticeably compressed, with not so crisp image quality. This service used to be offered by companies who wanted people to pay a good amount of money monthly so I think that Opera is really trying hard to compete with Firefox. Personally, I almost always disable imaged on FF or Opera, so the turbo charge wouldn't be so useful for me.
Either way, there's no question that Opera is blazingly fast with or without Turbo boost. Tests aside, it just works faster. The tab switching is instant, the webpages load readable content faster. It seems to cache images better than Firefox.
Darn you Opera, you're making it hard to stick with Firefox. I need my extensions!















