webishqiptar, on Jan 11 2010, 11:03 AM, said:
well, I can see the difference, but what's the point? Is this your art or are you showing us how good you are in photoshop??
This isn't original art, i.e. I did not take the photograph.
What such practises do is create a challenge for the designer. If you can create skin tones from existing texture then it is valued by the advertising and beauty industry as it means you can overcome anomalies or even enhance the skin tone of the model.
It looks simple, but it took at least 6-8 hours to get the right colours across. This was done by comparing the models original skin tone. Further to this, the eye colour, the highlights in the hair, and cutting out her body and hair (which is the most difficult to feather out) to extract the model was done to establish a more human like tone.
I basically tried to reverse the image to her original.
If you're still questioning my logic, there's the original I used, so try it yourself...
BuffaloHelp, on Jan 11 2010, 10:54 AM, said:
Maybe it's my laptop but looks like the original picture just had the color balance and contrast enhanced.
I was looking for maybe lighter eye color, like light blue. Or, even yet a dramatic change to deep crystal blue.
One of my tattoo artists does this: he places his copyright like a tattoo on the body using photoshop. I thought it was a cool little trick. He bends and adds to the curvature of the location on the body. Your copyright or watermark would look good by her left arm, running down

Who knows.
That is an awesome trick. It's very possible although i've never tried it. I will try it, but the only problem is - if it's not big enough then it can be erased, and reclaimed.
That can really hurt - especially if it's original art...
But I will try creating that effect

-
Thanks!