Edited by Zagubadu·, 17 January 2010 - 07:48 AM.
| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Finally Got Caught
#1
Posted 17 January 2010 - 07:46 AM
#2
Posted 17 January 2010 - 08:10 AM
Zagubadu·, on Jan 17 2010, 01:46 AM, said:
#3
Posted 17 January 2010 - 08:17 AM
Quote
In the perspective from the law makers, there were elected to protect citizens. And one means of protecting citizens is to establish basic, if not, or specific guidelines that may effect large numbers of people. When those few are impaired from whatever endangers others with a device/item that can cause potentially great harm, then it's up to law makers to remove that "threat."
So, the question is, "using any inhibitors put others in danger?" I say inhibitors in a general sense of blocking natural function of sense. I have been on the road many times where people swerve in and out of the traffic lane because they were fumbling with the radio, flicking the cigarette, talking on the cellphone, dozing off from cold medicine and yes because they were high. I sure don't want to be in a traffic accident because someone wasn't paying attention. And narcotics have shown higher percentage distracting proper reactions. Well, that's my point of view. I am not judging the actual usage of pot is good or bad. But when a pot user decides to get behind the wheel and endanger other people's lives, that's when I have a problem. And I'm sure there are other million reasons why I don't want to be affected by those who disregard my boundary, my safety...
But the real question is, are you sorry that you got caught?
#4
Posted 17 January 2010 - 08:55 AM
BuffaloHelp, on Jan 17 2010, 03:17 AM, said:
In the perspective from the law makers, there were elected to protect citizens. And one means of protecting citizens is to establish basic, if not, or specific guidelines that may effect large numbers of people. When those few are impaired from whatever endangers others with a device/item that can cause potentially great harm, then it's up to law makers to remove that "threat."
So, the question is, "using any inhibitors put others in danger?" I say inhibitors in a general sense of blocking natural function of sense. I have been on the road many times where people swerve in and out of the traffic lane because they were fumbling with the radio, flicking the cigarette, talking on the cellphone, dozing off from cold medicine and yes because they were high. I sure don't want to be in a traffic accident because someone wasn't paying attention. And narcotics have shown higher percentage distracting proper reactions. Well, that's my point of view. I am not judging the actual usage of pot is good or bad. But when a pot user decides to get behind the wheel and endanger other people's lives, that's when I have a problem. And I'm sure there are other million reasons why I don't want to be affected by those who disregard my boundary, my safety...
But the real question is, are you sorry that you got caught?
Yea so alcohol and cigarettes get to stay because they are not anything like pot? No because they make a lot of money. And yes I could go do something else. To bad I do things while I am high homework, cleaning the house, anything. A lot of people think kids like me just smoke pot then sit their like a log.
#5
Posted 17 January 2010 - 09:47 AM
Zagubadu·, on Jan 17 2010, 02:55 AM, said:
#6
Posted 17 January 2010 - 12:26 PM
Zagubadu·, on Jan 17 2010, 07:46 AM, said:
Basically, they've informed the police of what you've done and what evidence they have. It is then generally up to the police to decide what to do about it, if anything at all. As you're in the US I'm not sure what the process is like or whether it is something that would appear on any criminal records checks run against you.
#8
Posted 17 January 2010 - 01:51 PM
anwiii, on Jan 17 2010, 12:30 PM, said:
I'm one of those people who has no criminal record and a clean driving licence
#9
Posted 17 January 2010 - 05:02 PM
Zagubadu·, on Jan 17 2010, 08:46 AM, said:
If they didn't actually catch you with any in your possession then there isn't anything they can really do.
Depending on how old you are, they might try and put you into some kind of rehab program.
Everything in moderation they say. If weed were legalized it wouldn't be grouped together with dangerous things
such as cocaine and methamphetamine. The fact is alcohol is much, much more worse and fully legal. Alcohol
is just as destructive if not more so than any narcotic
Marijjuanna is no priority to me. Sometimes the law could be a bit more objective and equal across the board though.
If your going to ban one thing then ban them all, including alcohol.
Only a complete hypocrite would condemn marijuana and then go and get drunk.
#10
Posted 17 January 2010 - 08:38 PM
networker, on Jan 17 2010, 12:02 PM, said:
Depending on how old you are, they might try and put you into some kind of rehab program.
Everything in moderation they say. If weed were legalized it wouldn't be grouped together with dangerous things
such as cocaine and methamphetamine. The fact is alcohol is much, much more worse and fully legal. Alcohol
is just as destructive if not more so than any narcotic
Marijjuanna is no priority to me. Sometimes the law could be a bit more objective and equal across the board though.
If your going to ban one thing then ban them all, including alcohol.
Only a complete hypocrite would condemn marijuana and then go and get drunk.
Exactly! Its just marijuana been illegal for some time. I think it was first made illegal because this guy saw that hemp ( What you can actually make out of the plant not the buds you smoke ) Was allot more efficient and better to be used as paper, cloths. In this case its paper because he had a paper mill and somehow he started a bunch of stuff about how bad pot is. Which he then tied in to a bunch of racist crap. It was then known as like the Crazed Black Man Drug. ( You can picture what should have been there instead of "Black Man" ) And its been illegal ever since. Now don't quote me these are just things I have heard. All of the stuff about racism is true.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















