| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Adverts, Admins: Dont Go There.
#1
Posted 09 February 2010 - 09:29 AM
Now, i am 99.9% sure this is not adware on my PC. So.... I do not want to buy bob dylan tickets, i have no interest in him, live concerts or tickets of any kind. Nor have i any history relating to tickets, so if you are going to do averts at least look at what they are advertising for christs sake!
Next, i dont want a frikking side bar there that looks so damn ugly. Not to mention the fact that it is laggy and disrupts the view of the page its just frikking ugly, i mean seriously, have you guys even looked at the ads that you allow on your site?
Think about it.
Needless to say that is not blocked along with answers.com which was the most irritating advert system in the world. I would strongly suggest scrapping it.
Oh and then the twitter etc... buttons, yup they got blocked too because they are irritating. If i had a twitter account i would tweet about T17 in my own good time!!!
Did you guys even look at this side bar? It appears not.
If any T17 members want a little tutorial on blocking these intrusions then say so in this thread anad if demand is enough ill post a tutorial.
Just dont go there T17...
#2
Posted 09 February 2010 - 10:25 AM
Not a problem but as it is flash based and takes lot of time to load i prefer not to use it. Noscript addon on firefox may able to block it. yet to try that though,will let you know if it can block that peace of button.
But if i have to vote for this stuff, i'll say no to that sidebar chatbox.
#4
Posted 09 February 2010 - 10:31 AM
#5
Posted 09 February 2010 - 10:56 AM
anyway, something to get used to for the time being i guess. i think a chat box will draw in more visitors to become members too....
#8
Posted 09 February 2010 - 02:06 PM
It's seriously not a good idea, it lags so much! I mean i would be half-annoyed if there wasn't a freakin' Bob dylan ticket ad there! I mean, who on Trap17 is gonna buy some Bob Dylan Tickets? If i wanted them, i would have got there through by searching in google.
If this is the future replacement for the 'old not so good time travelling' shoutbox, i would rather have the one which is there now.
#9
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:43 PM
The blinking is extremely annoying, i dont even know why anyone would ever design it like that. whoever done that is a complete idiot!
I too understand the need for adverts but that is definitely not the way to do it... The only two things they couldve done worse are popups and in-line text links inserted automatically into post content... Then i think i would actually cancel my account...
#10
Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:55 PM
#11
Posted 09 February 2010 - 06:44 PM
#13
Posted 09 February 2010 - 07:41 PM
mahesh2k, on Feb 9 2010, 02:08 PM, said:
#14
Posted 09 February 2010 - 10:27 PM
THIS NEEDS TO BE TAKEN DOWN NOW. i said i probably wasn't going to block this thing, but i have quickly changed my mind if it doesn't get taken down by tomorrow because this thing is driving me crazy with this annoying user....
#15
Posted 09 February 2010 - 11:38 PM
#16
Posted 10 February 2010 - 12:27 AM
but yea, on the shout box, there was rules being broken and even some of the mods have blocked it so the rules on trap wont be enforced. you can change your name and pretend to be someone you aren't. i don't like that feature. and then you get the whiners who spam over and over and over and over again and ruin the mood.
i don't like it and it's more than just the blinking and the beeps for me as i was going to give that a chance to get used to.
Nelson Blogs, on Feb 9 2010, 05:38 PM, said:
#18
Posted 10 February 2010 - 03:20 AM
#19
Posted 10 February 2010 - 03:26 AM
OpaQue might be trying something new. And so it looks bad. Man, these complaints are just getting bigger and bigger...
So this chat does not work with this forum and you. But I do remember members kept requesting for better shoutbox or chatbox as I recall. Give OpaQue some time to adjust or get a new one. Again, be patient until all kinks are worked out.
#20
Posted 10 February 2010 - 03:30 AM
#21
Posted 10 February 2010 - 04:44 AM
i actually like the fact that opaque is open to thinking about new things around here to spice things up. keep in mind though, putting a chat up means a more fixed moderation system in place too
excuse me. i heard a beep. i have to see who it is.....
BuffaloHelp, on Feb 9 2010, 09:26 PM, said:
OpaQue might be trying something new. And so it looks bad. Man, these complaints are just getting bigger and bigger...
So this chat does not work with this forum and you. But I do remember members kept requesting for better shoutbox or chatbox as I recall. Give OpaQue some time to adjust or get a new one. Again, be patient until all kinks are worked out.
#25
Posted 10 February 2010 - 12:45 PM
truefusion, on Feb 10 2010, 01:11 AM, said:
Thanks for that,truefusion.
Coming back to topic, bumpin scripts are blocked for me so i can try that any more. I checked the site with chrome and it is not appearing.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















