Quote
Aside from the navigation alignment, from an eye-appealing perspective, this template doesn't compete with your current. It also seems like you keep falling back on a similar design style as some of your past designs. However, i will say the font you picked for the site's name for this new template is a whole lot better and much more fitting. Your site's icon may need to be changed to reflect the new font. But i'd recommend a few modifications, similar to this (perhaps some bevel):
Hmm, I agree. I'm just sucking in this atm, everything is slipping out of my hands... The font is tahoma. I'll try to make a logo similar to that in the image you provided, thanks for helping in that.
Quote
This new template also appears slightly easier to follow, but that can be swayed when the actual content gets set in place. The area where the breadcrumbs are, it seems like a spot more fitting for sub items of the navigation, though you may not have any. By the looks of it, though, i don't think your site requires breadcrumbs at this time. Your navigation isn't multiple levels and all is accessible from every page.
Okay, I'm going to make it multiple levels to fit everything I have into one bar. I made a new design(oh yes...). I have these 2 now, the other one doesn't have all the searchboxes and other "extra" stuff in it yet because I haven't coded it yet:
design.png 125.86K
13 downloads
I forgot to change the font to tahoma in the sidebar in this one before exporting tho.
Now, I removed the breadcrumb trail in the original one:
Screenshot_2.png 79.38K
15 downloads
Quote
While more related to the site as a whole, rather than having a "Home" link, have it so when the user clicks on the site's logo, it takes you home. And if "Home" is a word used by WordPress, change it to your site's name (seems odd seeing "Home > Archive by category 'GIMP'"). "Announcements" aren't tutorials, are they? It should go along with those at the top. Personally, though, i would make the navigation slightly more simpler by creating another root item called "Tutorials" and shoving "GIMP," "HTML & CSS" and "Misc" into it. That way you'd have four root items: Announcements, Freebies, Tutorials and About.
I was thinking of having both, just because it seems a little more standard to have a logo link and a home link. I've now changed the logo on my site to be a link also. I've shoved them all into a "tutorials" parent in the new design, but if do that that in the blog-like design, I'll only have 2 links in there and it'll look kinda empty(except if I get rid of one of the bars).
I also changed "Home" into "Tutoriary.com".
Quote
It shouldn't have taken more than 30 minutes (assuming you have intermediate knowledge of HTML and CSS)—sounds like you are giving yourself more work than what is required. Here are a few tips to help you speed up the process:
- Unless it is absolutely necessary to have rounded corners visible in all browsers, use the CSS property border-radius instead.
- Don't cut out sections that don't need cutting out. Concerning this new design, it requires no more than having four parts cut out: all the gradients (3) and the site's name (1).
- Keeping in mind that you'll eventually have to cut your design into pieces, design with making your job easier. (However, this current design satisfies this.)
- For areas of one color, let the CSS handle it.
- For borders, unless it concerns something complex, let the CSS handle it.
- Some browsers support SVG backgrounds. SVG is capable of scalable gradients, and a lot of other things, something that no raster image can ever accomplish. Consider this for the next time you use gradients. (However, i think WordPress has a similar feature—which can be seen on its default template.)
What can I say, I'm slow, though I was a bit lazy about coding when I made this, I couldn't have ever got it done in 30 minutes. I know how to do it(regarding the knowledge), I'm just slooooooooooooooooowwwww.
10 % of my visitors use IE, and with the average 8 visitors per day I have, I'm not sure if I want to leave that 10 % out by using CSS3? I'm using 5 images to get rounded corners for everything right now. The file size of all the images I use on that purple blue template is around 25 KB, with those 5 images are taking up 5 KB. I could shove them into one image to reduce http requests and use bg positioning to use them...
The problem with SVG is again, browser support, it would be great otherwise. Cutting the design to separate images is pretty much easy, I just merge all layers, press R and start cropping, saving and undoing.
Thanks for replying(where are all the other people, trap is so inactive nowadays), and don't forget to review the second template, too!