| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Missing Posts
Started by rpgsearcherz, Jul 02 2010 10:32 PM
37 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:32 PM
Gotta vent about this -- me and Anwii both have the same issue right now and I think I narrowed it down.
I have lost literally around 20 posts now (some of which took 15+ mins to post, as they were detailed -- and I ended up just putting in much shorter versions of them the second time). Pretty annoying.
Anyways, I think the issue has to do with the QuickReply. I have noticed that if I use the full reply it *always* works, whereas with the QuickReply it sometimes does, sometimes does not. On one post QR failed so I tried it 3x, failed all 3 times. Tried normal reply, worked on the first try.
Just wanted to share that with you all/get my frustration out on it, lol.
I have lost literally around 20 posts now (some of which took 15+ mins to post, as they were detailed -- and I ended up just putting in much shorter versions of them the second time). Pretty annoying.
Anyways, I think the issue has to do with the QuickReply. I have noticed that if I use the full reply it *always* works, whereas with the QuickReply it sometimes does, sometimes does not. On one post QR failed so I tried it 3x, failed all 3 times. Tried normal reply, worked on the first try.
Just wanted to share that with you all/get my frustration out on it, lol.
#2
Posted 03 July 2010 - 12:00 AM
although i am sure the quick reply has it's problems too, the post not showing is not just due to the quick reply since i never use it
people were already complaining about the quick reply a while back and although we were assured it was fixed, i never trusted it and always replied the standard way. so the 3 posts i made which i mentioned in another topic were from a standard reply.
i am curious though now if this is limited to replies only or if anyone tried to start a new topic that didn't show in a non moderated area of the forum. it's something think about too just in case.
i am curious though now if this is limited to replies only or if anyone tried to start a new topic that didn't show in a non moderated area of the forum. it's something think about too just in case.
#3
Posted 03 July 2010 - 12:12 AM
It's real weird. I haven't had any threads not show up yet.
I did notice an issue earlier though when starting a thread -- it errored out on me saying the forums were out of memory (something about it being at 194 MB's of memory already -- it was an exact number like 194023913) and I ended up accidentally creating three threads because of it.
I have a feeling that if the normal reply is having the same issues, then most of our problems are due to the error with forums being full of memory.
I did notice an issue earlier though when starting a thread -- it errored out on me saying the forums were out of memory (something about it being at 194 MB's of memory already -- it was an exact number like 194023913) and I ended up accidentally creating three threads because of it.
I have a feeling that if the normal reply is having the same issues, then most of our problems are due to the error with forums being full of memory.
#5
Posted 03 July 2010 - 01:43 AM
magnafrost, on 03 July 2010 - 01:09 AM, said:
194?! Isn't that way too small! I guess the good thing is its pretty easy to solve by adding some more memory.
I thought it was pretty small too but maybe the forums are hosted on a server with like 256 MB of ram (since before, it didn't really have any issues -- why upgrade what wasn't broken?). If that's the case then I can understand the RAM problem.
Or it may be on a shared host as well (like a lot of our hosting packages are).
Either way, hopefully that knowledge helps the the admin in some way, and maybe it'll help solve some of the issues we've been having.
#8
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:42 AM
OpaQue, on 03 July 2010 - 06:39 AM, said:
HaAHaHa... Thank God! QUICK REPLY is gone forever. atleast, something good happened. I edited all forums and disabled quick reply in all.
NEXT QUESTION: Should RICH TEXT EDITOR be enabled?
NEXT QUESTION: Should RICH TEXT EDITOR be enabled?
Really I don't see the use in it. I think normal text is fine, considering we still have formatting choices (bold, underline, sizes, alignment, etc.). So I really don't see the point in it to begin with.
I'd definitely say to keep it off if it's going to cause more complications.
About the missing posts, I'll let you know if I run into any more.
#9
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:53 AM
deadmad7, on 03 July 2010 - 06:56 AM, said:
Nope, the normal text editor is not fine, sure YOU CAN edit and bold things and underline stuff, but what about the people who are not familiar with the html codes and things? What will people who just want to use KnowledgeSutra to share opinions and they don't know all the html things. I'll actually liked the images in the rich text editor.. it showed it while you editing it, it looked nicer.
Ah, I had never even used it.
As for your other post, maybe my post on normal reply just happened to come at the right time (after ram usage was freed) or something. I was mostly just posting that information as a debugging method.
#10
Posted 03 July 2010 - 06:54 AM
anwiii, on 03 July 2010 - 12:00 AM, said:
although i am sure the quick reply has it's problems too, the post not showing is not just due to the quick reply since i never use it
people were already complaining about the quick reply a while back and although we were assured it was fixed, i never trusted it and always replied the standard way. so the 3 posts i made which i mentioned in another topic were from a standard reply.
i am curious though now if this is limited to replies only or if anyone tried to start a new topic that didn't show in a non moderated area of the forum. it's something think about too just in case.
i am curious though now if this is limited to replies only or if anyone tried to start a new topic that didn't show in a non moderated area of the forum. it's something think about too just in case.
magnafrost, on 03 July 2010 - 01:09 AM, said:
194?! Isn't that way too small! I guess the good thing is its pretty easy to solve by adding some more memory.
OpaQue, on 03 July 2010 - 06:26 AM, said:
It has to be the RICH TEXT editor trying to Load Javascript on the fly. However, I have disabled the RICH TEXT editor. This must solve this issue.
thank you.
thank you.
OpaQue, on 03 July 2010 - 06:39 AM, said:
HaAHaHa... Thank God! QUICK REPLY is gone forever. atleast, something good happened. I edited all forums and disabled quick reply in all.
NEXT QUESTION: Should RICH TEXT EDITOR be enabled?
NEXT QUESTION: Should RICH TEXT EDITOR be enabled?
And YES, please ENABLE RICH TEXT EDITOR.
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















