| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
Mycent Update Calculations
#1
Posted 14 July 2010 - 05:34 PM
The way the script seems to work is the following (this may not be correct, but it's how it seems to work):
You make 50 posts, the system does the update and calculates your mycents based on those 50 posts
You make 20 more, the system recalculates based on 70 posts and then subtracts your total mycents earned from before. This is your new addition.
You have 5 posts deleted and make 10 more, the system recalculates based on (50 + 20 + 10 - 5) and then subtracts all of your previously earned mycents.
Please understand that in the number of posts, it is not based on the actual number. I just mean it's calculating those posts. Such as if you earned 5, 17, 21, 3, and 8 mycents for the first 5 posts, the "5" just represents the total calculation there (5+17+21+3+8).
In other words, it is always doing full recalculations of everything on the forums. Spam posts/deleted posts would be factored in during the next "run" of the script, which is how you can go into negative (which Opaque stated will not remove funds from your Xisto account, just your mycents on the forums until you clear them again).
This should help explain (if you have any posts removed) why you may not be getting updates. It should clear up confusion from the few people here who are also trying to spam in some posts and not in others, in an attempt to not get docked for it.
#2
Posted 14 July 2010 - 05:57 PM
#3
Posted 14 July 2010 - 06:12 PM
Saint_Michael, on 14 July 2010 - 05:57 PM, said:
You misinterpreted the post. Instead of reading it as 50 posts, read it as 50,000 characters then.
I was using posts because it's a much smaller number and I was hoping to avoid confusion.
The updates aren't based on *anything* other than when the script is run. I was just trying to explain why peoples' mycents fluctuate from time to time. In that, I used the assumption that they had made 50 posts before the first update. Whether those were worth 1 mycent or 50 mycents each is irrelevant -- the fact is they were counted. When 5 were counted as spam, those 5 were removed from the mycents earned (again, the amount is irrelevant, the fact is whatever the total counted as spam was, is removed from the total earned).
I wasn't insinuating that post count had anything to do with it.
Pretty much what I stated above is exactly what you responded with, only I used a real-world example to better help the reader visualize what is going on.
#4
Posted 14 July 2010 - 07:20 PM
There is already one thread that is going on about mean/average and now this thread about mycent update. Let's see if we can figure out few things by brainstorming about it.
#5
Posted 14 July 2010 - 08:02 PM
mahesh2k, on 14 July 2010 - 07:20 PM, said:
There is already one thread that is going on about mean/average and now this thread about mycent update. Let's see if we can figure out few things by brainstorming about it.
The whole basis of the other thread is some kind of proportionality between the number of lines and myCents. If that's not true, I guess we are back to square one and need to wait for Opaque's comments to have any clue whatsoever.
#6
Posted 14 July 2010 - 08:18 PM
magnafrost, on 14 July 2010 - 08:02 PM, said:
Opaque already stated that the usefulness of threads has a weight now. More or less meaning if you make a post and nobody reads it (because it's trash) it has no real value. The ones tons of people visit have value because people view them as being more important.
So if someone writes 50 pages and has one person view it, and another writes one line but has 50k people view it, the one with one line should earn significantly more.
#7
Posted 14 July 2010 - 09:06 PM
Quote
I'm not sure if my this post gets approved so in that case how mycents will look for posts weight in sandbox ? or is it completely discarded and only posted replies are taken into consideration ?. Like this there are many questions in mind,let's see if i can find out how this whole thing works.
#8
Posted 15 July 2010 - 06:06 AM
rpgsearcherz, on 14 July 2010 - 08:18 PM, said:
So if someone writes 50 pages and has one person view it, and another writes one line but has 50k people view it, the one with one line should earn significantly more.
That makes perfect sense. I love it that the new system is very smart! Not that I was part of the old system but still 'new' sounds good
1) Number of words in the post (All other factors being equal, it will still contribute)
2) Whether its a reply to a topic or a new thread (New topic = more value)
3) Number of views
4) Word formation (I'm not sure about this , I'm assuming it based on something I've read here)
5) Time taken to reply (From previous post I assume)
6) Value of links in the post (Maybe wikipedia, how do we ensure people don't spam this ? )
Am i missing something ? Are any of these totally off the mark ?
#9
Posted 15 July 2010 - 07:06 AM
mahesh2k, on 14 July 2010 - 07:20 PM, said:
There is already one thread that is going on about mean/average and now this thread about mycent update. Let's see if we can figure out few things by brainstorming about it.
You're right - now it's not just about how long your post is. Actually I think V3 also took the 'usefulness' of the thread into consideration, but then if you had a very large post you could get away with earning a huge pile of cents! Now it's all about how useful the post is to the community and how many people like it, etc. All in all, the calculation has become way too complex and that's why I'm focusing on making posts instead of trying to figure out a way to make more myCENTs
#10
Posted 15 July 2010 - 10:20 PM
Quote
Wow, that kinda sucks. Especially for me. We just don't have that many people here that are seriously into pets/dogs, and goat farmers are even in shorter supply! I have a tough enough time trying to write enough posts to keep up my web hosting as it is. This sure isn't going to help!
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















