14 replies to this topic

[Saint_Michael]

Well, Internet explorer 9 beta is out and I have to say looks wise I am impressed. Microsoft went the route of Chrome and gave it a minimalist browser look and that is a big plus. Also from a quick overview, it would seem they added their own Developer tools as well, shocking, but other then that it looks a lot better and it would seem HTML5 support is there as I have a couple of HTML5 based websites on my computer and I have to say I am impressed with it as well.

Now for the fun part, the acid tests, I made sure all the browsers were current and here are my results.

Quote

Firefox 3.6.9
Passed 1 and 2
Acid 3 91/100

Firefox 4b5
Passed 1 and 2
92/100

IE9 Beta
Passed 1 and 2
Acid 3 93/100

Chrome 7.0.503.0
Passed 1 and 2
100/100

Opera 10.62
Passed 1 and 2
100/100

Safari 5.0.2
Passed 1 and 2
100/100

I have to say I am borderline shocked and impressed with IE9 results and if memory serves me correctly IE8 failed horribly at an abysmal 22 out of a 100. So this is huge for Microsoft to score that high, especially in beta. Hopefully they this number as well and try to see if they can bring up to 100 and start bringing back some of its glory it has lost since IE7 and IE8.

[truefusion]

As a correction to the list provided, Opera 10.62 does indeed pass the acid test 100%. I also find interesting that the listed results show that Safari didn't pass the test and Chrome did though they both use Webkit. I suppose Google has made some changes to the Webkit engine for their browser. I will have to check this out the next time i'm in Windows.

[Saint_Michael]

I reran the tests and your correct, I guess when I ran them the acid test was being broken on me,

[Quatrux]

As I know IE9 fully supports HTML5 tests? and Chrome is second? I tried Chrome with HTML5 tests, so I would like to know what are the results with IE9 an other browsers running this test?

http://html5test.com/

As I read, it seems that IE9 beats Chrome, so you could also do a list with the test results here like you did with Acid3, also it is strange that IE9 doesn't pass Acid3 as they said it will pass it and etc.

It seems that Microsoft wants the browser market back and are working on it, due to for a lot of years IE6 sucked due to that fact, I still don't use IE8 even though it got better, I still use Opera and Chrome and tend to use it due to the features and capabilities it offers.

[inea]

http://www.beautyoftheweb.com

This is the website that provides Internet Explorer 9 Beta.

It seems nice to get some explanation of the tests in the opening post. The posted results are not clear.

It seems Microsoft decided to copy Google. Internet Explorer 9 Beta looks a lot like Chrome. The first impression is that Internet Explorer 9 Beta is much faster compared to Internet Explorer 8.

Actually this represents the policy of Microsoft. New programs and new ways that work well are copied by Microsoft. Like the user interface of the operating program of Apple. And Internet Explorer can be considered to be a copy of Netscapce.

[Saint_Michael]

Quatrux, on 16 September 2010 - 02:04 PM, said:

As I know IE9 fully supports HTML5 tests? and Chrome is second? I tried Chrome with HTML5 tests, so I would like to know what are the results with IE9 an other browsers running this test?

http://html5test.com/

As I read, it seems that IE9 beats Chrome, so you could also do a list with the test results here like you did with Acid3, also it is strange that IE9 doesn't pass Acid3 as they said it will pass it and etc.

It seems that Microsoft wants the browser market back and are working on it, due to for a lot of years IE6 sucked due to that fact, I still don't use IE8 even though it got better, I still use Opera and Chrome and tend to use it due to the features and capabilities it offers.

I had completely forgot about that website to test out HTML 5 compatibility and so after running the tests on all the browsers, even IE7 and 8 Here are the results.

Quote

96+3 = IE9
27 = IE8
27 = IE7
159+7 = Opera
207+7 Safari
139+4 FF 3.6
222+10 = Chrome
204+9 FF4b5

Clearly Chrome dominates in the HTML 5 support and from the works of it, Microsoft has a lot a work to do and I mean a lot of work to do. However, I will say they have improved a lot since IE8 in terms of support but one would think they be in the high 100s. Granted HTML5 is a work in progress and odds are by the time it is fully accepted in 2025 (UG), IE 15 will be out and I will have gone blind. Of course, I am a bit surprise with Firefox 4, I thought it would be a bit higher then that but compared to 3 it is better.

Well IE6 was the best browser for its time, but when IE7 and IE8 came out, well lets just say everyone started switching, hopefully with IE9 people will start to flock back. As for the acid test score, they never passed it, they showed off that it was in the 90s and I do believe it was 90/100 when they first showed some screens.

inea, on 16 September 2010 - 02:25 PM, said:

http://www.beautyoftheweb.com

This is the website that provides Internet Explorer 9 Beta.

It seems nice to get some explanation of the tests in the opening post. The posted results are not clear.

It seems Microsoft decided to copy Google. Internet Explorer 9 Beta looks a lot like Chrome. The first impression is that Internet Explorer 9 Beta is much faster compared to Internet Explorer 8.

Actually this represents the policy of Microsoft. New programs and new ways that work well are copied by Microsoft. Like the user interface of the operating program of Apple. And Internet Explorer can be considered to be a copy of Netscapce.

If you look at all the browsers, there is nothing original in them, it is mostly tweaks in the engine that separate the browsers.

[inea]

Saint_Michael, on 16 September 2010 - 04:09 PM, said:

If you look at all the browsers, there is nothing original in them, it is mostly tweaks in the engine that separate the browsers.

The way it looks, the window that appears when the browser opens, looks a lot like Chrome. What is the meaning of the numbers? Is higher better?

[dab]

I stopped using IE since FF came out, but I was curious to see this new ui IE is flaunting. First of all, my internet is slow. I hated the fact that you had to Download a 45mb file, just to download it again. Why on earth would I want to do that? Anyway, after a system restart, I was able to see the newly ui'ed browser. I hate it. The tabs should not be on the right of the url bar. That's just crowded. I agree, the url bar doesn't need to be that long (as on chrome) since most urls are SEO friendly and url shorteners are used more and more. However, the tabs can't be crammed like that. I made 5 tabs with my browser and it was already clipping the titles of the pages.

In more relation to this post, I'm glad to see MS sticking to standards a bit more. Its finally about time. As a web developer, I can say IE was losing my support at about IE 7. If they can pick up their standards a bit more, I think IE might get back in with the new big boys.

Until then, Nice try IE, better luck next round.

[inea]

Maybe opening new windows in stead of using tabs might solve the problem.

[dab]

That's not solving the problem. That's avoiding the problem. :/ Which tends to be the way it shouldn't be, they should fix it, or allow us to fix us it ourselves, which is something Microsoft won't do. Let's hope they fix it or change it before the final release.