sheepdog, on 01 December 2010 - 08:36 PM, said:
I definatly agree with you on this one. The word Troll springs up from the lips of anyone who seems to be on the loosing end of an online debate, no matter how factual and relavent and accurate the supposed "trolls" opinion may be.
I try to resevere the word troll for those annoying humans that just pop up and start blasting foul language or excedding stupid comments, like someone who comes into a G rated chat room and asks if anybody want to suck his ____ well, you get the idea. Anything for shock value. What ever it takes to get a rise out of people and create a nusance. I personally don't understand this mentality.
Those of us of a certain age remember the word as it was first used. Early trolls were normally quite clever and trolling wasn't exactly frowned upon by all. A troll was someone who, spotting a naive poster, would cast the net by issuing some blatantly wrong-looking statement in a posting (this was on Usenet of course - before the web). The idea was to provoke indignation and outrage in the poster, and then show them that what they thought was a ridiculous point was actually correct and that their understanding was at fault.
There was quite a bit of this sort of trolling in the days of UseNet and the reaction to being hooked was normally 'damn, I swallowed the bait whole, didn't I?' at which point there would be general smiles and all would then be fine.
Nowadays, as stated, the word is used to define anyone and any posting that someone takes objection to and it has therefore become almost meaningless.
Other terms from those early days have also morphed. 'Mail Bomb' was an interesting one with two possible origins. The generally accepted one is that it was a punishment (often used against those who tried to do commercial business on the early internet - Oh the irony!). Selling stuff was a big no-no and as a punishment you would be sent hundreds of copies of a large document (the bible was sometimes used). This mattered in those days, because access was mostly slow and expensive (1200/300 modems) so you would have to pay a small fortune to download the emails that you didn't want anyway - and there was often no other way to clear your inbox.
The other possible origin results from the academic unwillingess to conform to authority. It became known that the authorities were routinely scanning email and usenet postings, using filters that would pick up on suspicious words or phrases (terrorist, explosion etc). As a protest against this many academics would deliberately include the word 'bomb' in every email or usenet posting they made - the idea being to jam the monitoring software, rather like a modern-day denial of service attack.
Those were the days :-)...
Edited by Bikerman, 12 December 2010 - 10:08 PM.