| |
|
Welcome to KnowledgeSutra - Dear Guest | |
ONE FINAL HOSTING PACKAGE!
Started by OpaQue, Aug 17 2004 04:47 PM
21 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 August 2004 - 04:47 PM
Even though I am offering so much, ratings at other sites go down because I also have initial packages. I was thinking about just ONE Package with 150 mb space and 1 GB BW! @ 50 posts. And users are supposed to be active. Please post your comments and suggestions.
#3
Posted 17 August 2004 - 05:16 PM
admin, i thought you're planning on having 101MB space + 5GB bandwidth
package?
how about a 2-3GB (bandwidth instead as a compromise? 
posts count will not be a problem for most of us who are really into
trap17.
it's best if we just stick to one package from hereon. too much changes
within a span of days will just confuse members, future and present.
also, sticking to one package with a determined number of GOOD posts
(in this case, 50), will thresh out those "fly-by-night" members who just
come in here for a "free ride" without contributing helpful posts to other
forum members.
i would opt for your earlier plan of having a higher bandwidth allotment for
members, IF possible.
package?
posts count will not be a problem for most of us who are really into
trap17.
it's best if we just stick to one package from hereon. too much changes
within a span of days will just confuse members, future and present.
also, sticking to one package with a determined number of GOOD posts
(in this case, 50), will thresh out those "fly-by-night" members who just
come in here for a "free ride" without contributing helpful posts to other
forum members.
i would opt for your earlier plan of having a higher bandwidth allotment for
members, IF possible.
#8
Posted 18 August 2004 - 01:50 AM
Then May be 150 MB with 1.5 GB BW. The thing is some people as I have seen don't knw what to upload and webdesigning stuff. I had atleast 10 members who uploaded BMP files each about 400 - 2000 Kb.. So, I think so much is enough.. I will give upgrades to serious people who have a good site. ( which do not post BMP files and downloads )
#14
Posted 19 August 2004 - 07:31 AM
campainer, on Aug 19 2004, 07:14 AM, said:
I think you should do some thing like:
25 posts == 20mb of space
25 posts == 50mb of BW
so you can choose how much of each you want.
just my 5 cents
Laterz
Matty
25 posts == 20mb of space
25 posts == 50mb of BW
so you can choose how much of each you want.
just my 5 cents
Laterz
Matty
I think you should give a bandwidth to space ratio at 30:1 respectively. That's quite reasonable.
However, I like the 4th package, which is 150 MB and 3 GB BW. Its quite good. IF you do plan to have a 5th plan, you could probably consider having 200 MB space and 5 GB bandwidth.
Just my opinion. Anyway, admin still has the final say.
#15
Posted 19 August 2004 - 08:22 AM
You know what would be cool? If you could put your own package toghether, like you could say how much bandwith and how much space etc... Based on points given by administrators and moderators for good posts, banners, buttons etc! I dont know any host that does that, so it might be a good idea... But it is a lot of work
#18
Posted 19 August 2004 - 04:59 PM
Suppose I give 1 GB space and 5 GB BW to one user who posts 2000 posts and one fine day another new user requests for hosting, do you think I will be able to provide him?
I want to think for all.... the way your thinking is limited to you only. I think the maximum space and BW would be 100 mb and 2 GB BW.
Or may be I will give more space and BW to genuine users who need it if they agree to put my adcode .. or something. It becomes too expensive. once I cross 2 GB BW. Because I don't like overselling! and I don't want to risk user's accounts.
I want to think for all.... the way your thinking is limited to you only. I think the maximum space and BW would be 100 mb and 2 GB BW.
Or may be I will give more space and BW to genuine users who need it if they agree to put my adcode .. or something. It becomes too expensive. once I cross 2 GB BW. Because I don't like overselling! and I don't want to risk user's accounts.
#19
Posted 19 August 2004 - 05:31 PM
Well, that sure is a problem... cant you just revieuw how much bandwith a site uses and if its beneath a class like 1000 or 2000 you give the hosting that ammount of bandwith?Trap17 is cool but Downgrading aint a very good option unless you have a very good offer...
Is it possible to buy additional Space/Bandwith myself and if yes, how mych would it cost at trap17? I might want to consider paying for an accaunt... If my clan will be a busy clan...
Is it possible to buy additional Space/Bandwith myself and if yes, how mych would it cost at trap17? I might want to consider paying for an accaunt... If my clan will be a busy clan...
#20
Posted 19 August 2004 - 07:53 PM
Quote
Or may be I will give more space and BW to genuine users who need it if they agree to put my adcode .. or something. It becomes too expensive.
i think that will be real nice admin. Without you saying it, i will put TRAP17 ad code on my site so that more and more people will get to know about trap17 (but admin, you got to understan that too much population isnt too good for trap17)
it aint everyone that has the monet to pay for a paid hosting Florisjuh so you keep that out of the talk.
you are going a lil' bit of point (sorry to say that pls)
Reply to this topic

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














